On the road to somewhere: Commentary on Breiner et al., Matheson et al., and Palmer et al.

This commentary considers the contribution of three papers (Breiner et al., Matheson et al., and Palmer et al.) that explore very different approaches to the treatment of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID). Comparison is made with the development over time of psychological therapies for other eating disorders and how we need to be open to different possible approaches so that we can eventually find our way to the best treatment(s) in the field of ARFID. Following that, summaries of each paper are given, including consideration of their different methodologies, measures, samples, and treatment outcomes. There are also suggestions for future research that expand on the authors' ideas. The literature is clearly still very disparate, as one might expect at this early stage in the development of treatments for the range of ARFID presentations. However, these papers are all valuable pointers as to where the treatment literature on ARFID might be going in the long term.

Publication Details

Journal
White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Published
2025-06-01
Primary Topic
Theoretical and Computational Physics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the road to somewhere: Commentary on Breiner et al., Matheson et al., and Palmer et al.

White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Theoretical and Computational Physics
article

On the road to somewhere: Commentary on Breiner et al., Matheson et al., and Palmer et al.

article en

Abstract

This commentary considers the contribution of three papers (Breiner et al., Matheson et al., and Palmer et al.) that explore very different approaches to the treatment of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID). Comparison is made with the development over time of psychological therapies for other eating disorders and how we need to be open to different possible approaches so that we can eventually find our way to the best treatment(s) in the field of ARFID. Following that, summaries of each paper are given, including consideration of their different methodologies, measures, samples, and treatment outcomes. There are also suggestions for future research that expand on the authors' ideas. The literature is clearly still very disparate, as one might expect at this early stage in the development of treatments for the range of ARFID presentations. However, these papers are all valuable pointers as to where the treatment literature on ARFID might be going in the long term.

White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Theoretical and Computational Physics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.