Favorable Living Donor Kidney Transplantation Outcomes within a National Kidney Exchange Program: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

BACKGROUND: KEPs (kidney exchange programs) facilitate living donor kidney transplantations (LDKT) for patients with incompatible donors, who are typically higher risk than non-KEP patients because of higher sensitization and longer dialysis vintage. We conducted a comparative analysis of graft outcomes and risk factors for both KEP and non-KEP living donor kidney transplants. METHODS: All LDKTs performed in the Netherlands between 2004-2021 were included. The primary outcome measures were one-, five- and 10-year death censored graft survival (DCGS). The secondary outcome measures were delayed graft function (DGF), graft function, rejection rates and patient survival. We used a propensity score matching model to account for differences at baseline. RESULTS: Out of 7536 LDKTs, 694 (9%) were transplanted via the KEP. Ten-year graft survival was similar for KEP 0.916 (95% CI: 0.894 - 0.939) and non-KEP 0.919 (0.912 - 0.926, p = 0.82). We observed significant differences in five-year rejection (12% vs 7%), and five-year patient survival (KEP: 84%, non-KEP: 90%), which was non-significant after propensity score matching. Significant risk factors for lower graft survival included high donor age, re-transplantations, extended dialysis vintage, higher panel reactive antibodies, and nephrotic syndrome as the cause of end-stage kidney disease . CONCLUSIONS: Transplantation via KEP offers a viable alternative for patients lacking compatible donors, avoiding specific and invasive pre- and post-transplant treatments. KEP's similar survival rate to non-KEP suggests prioritizing KEP LDKT over deceased donor kidney transplantation, desensitization, and dialysis. However, clinicians should consider the identified risk factors when planning and managing pre- and post-transplant care to enhance patient outcomes. Thus, we advocate for the broad adoption of KEP and establishment in regions lacking such programs, alongside initiation and expansion of international collaborations.

Publication Details

Journal
Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)
Published
2025-03-01
Primary Topic
Theoretical and Computational Physics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Favorable Living Donor Kidney Transplantation Outcomes within a National Kidney Exchange Program: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)
Theoretical and Computational Physics
article

Favorable Living Donor Kidney Transplantation Outcomes within a National Kidney Exchange Program: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: KEPs (kidney exchange programs) facilitate living donor kidney transplantations (LDKT) for patients with incompatible donors, who are typically higher risk than non-KEP patients because of higher sensitization and longer dialysis vintage. We conducted a comparative analysis of graft outcomes and risk factors for both KEP and non-KEP living donor kidney transplants. METHODS: All LDKTs performed in the Netherlands between 2004-2021 were included. The primary outcome measures were one-, five- and 10-year death censored graft survival (DCGS). The secondary outcome measures were delayed graft function (DGF), graft function, rejection rates and patient survival. We used a propensity score matching model to account for differences at baseline. RESULTS: Out of 7536 LDKTs, 694 (9%) were transplanted via the KEP. Ten-year graft survival was similar for KEP 0.916 (95% CI: 0.894 - 0.939) and non-KEP 0.919 (0.912 - 0.926, p = 0.82). We observed significant differences in five-year rejection (12% vs 7%), and five-year patient survival (KEP: 84%, non-KEP: 90%), which was non-significant after propensity score matching. Significant risk factors for lower graft survival included high donor age, re-transplantations, extended dialysis vintage, higher panel reactive antibodies, and nephrotic syndrome as the cause of end-stage kidney disease . CONCLUSIONS: Transplantation via KEP offers a viable alternative for patients lacking compatible donors, avoiding specific and invasive pre- and post-transplant treatments. KEP's similar survival rate to non-KEP suggests prioritizing KEP LDKT over deceased donor kidney transplantation, desensitization, and dialysis. However, clinicians should consider the identified risk factors when planning and managing pre- and post-transplant care to enhance patient outcomes. Thus, we advocate for the broad adoption of KEP and establishment in regions lacking such programs, alongside initiation and expansion of international collaborations.

Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Theoretical and Computational Physics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.