A cross-sectional study assessing modifications to the delivery of a multi-component implementation strategy (the Get Outside, Get Active program) to improve child physical activity in early childhood education and care services

AbstractIssue AddressedThe Get Outside, Get Active (GOGA) program is a randomised controlled trial which tested the impact of a multi‐component implementation strategy to support early childhood education and care (ECEC) services to replace indoor‐only free play with indoor–outdoor‐free play. This cross‐sectional study aims to describe the extent and nature of modifications made to implementation strategies and Behaviour Change Techniques (BCTs) using the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence‐based Implementation Strategies (FRAME‐IS) and to describe the fidelity of BCT delivery throughout GOGA.MethodsAn audit of records was undertaken throughout the intervention delivery period in the intervention arm. GOGA included 14 standard BCTs within six implementation strategies. Modifications and BCT delivery were recorded by Health Promotion Officers via project records. Modifications were categorised according to the FRAME‐IS. BCT delivery was recorded using a checklist.ResultsForty‐four ECEC services received the GOGA program. Overall, 60 modifications were recorded. According to FRAME‐IS categories, most modifications related to: content; format; pragmatic or practical considerations; tailoring/tweaking/refining in nature; fidelity was inconsistent; the goal was to increase the acceptability, appropriateness, or feasibility of the implementation effort; the rationale was at the practitioner level; and were unplanned/reactive. Overall, 96.4% of standard BCTs were delivered as intended.ConclusionsGOGA was delivered with high fidelity to protocol as indicated by the level of BCT delivery. This article details a thorough approach to documenting modifications and provides guidance for future studies.So What?This article contributes to the emerging evidence regarding documentation of adaptations and modifications to public health implementation interventions.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-04-15
Primary Topic
Theoretical and Computational Physics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A cross-sectional study assessing modifications to the delivery of a multi-component implementation strategy (the Get Outside, Get Active program) to improve child physical activity in early childhood education and care services

Figshare
Theoretical and Computational Physics
article

A cross-sectional study assessing modifications to the delivery of a multi-component implementation strategy (the Get Outside, Get Active program) to improve child physical activity in early childhood education and care services

article en

Abstract

AbstractIssue AddressedThe Get Outside, Get Active (GOGA) program is a randomised controlled trial which tested the impact of a multi‐component implementation strategy to support early childhood education and care (ECEC) services to replace indoor‐only free play with indoor–outdoor‐free play. This cross‐sectional study aims to describe the extent and nature of modifications made to implementation strategies and Behaviour Change Techniques (BCTs) using the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence‐based Implementation Strategies (FRAME‐IS) and to describe the fidelity of BCT delivery throughout GOGA.MethodsAn audit of records was undertaken throughout the intervention delivery period in the intervention arm. GOGA included 14 standard BCTs within six implementation strategies. Modifications and BCT delivery were recorded by Health Promotion Officers via project records. Modifications were categorised according to the FRAME‐IS. BCT delivery was recorded using a checklist.ResultsForty‐four ECEC services received the GOGA program. Overall, 60 modifications were recorded. According to FRAME‐IS categories, most modifications related to: content; format; pragmatic or practical considerations; tailoring/tweaking/refining in nature; fidelity was inconsistent; the goal was to increase the acceptability, appropriateness, or feasibility of the implementation effort; the rationale was at the practitioner level; and were unplanned/reactive. Overall, 96.4% of standard BCTs were delivered as intended.ConclusionsGOGA was delivered with high fidelity to protocol as indicated by the level of BCT delivery. This article details a thorough approach to documenting modifications and provides guidance for future studies.So What?This article contributes to the emerging evidence regarding documentation of adaptations and modifications to public health implementation interventions.

Figshare
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Theoretical and Computational Physics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.