Bakom arkiv och samlingar : Varför diskuteras problemen med AI sällan inom kulturarvsforskning?

Introduction. Recent research on cultural heritage was examined to explore the problems of AI in the heritage sector, including their impact on cultural heritage, their comparative representations, and how the heritage sector and broader computer science discourses approach these AI-issues differently. Methods. The combined hybrid text analysis method of exploratory nature consisted of distant and close reading approaches. Sources were 168 peer-reviewed articles from the Library & Information Science Collection (LISC) from 2020–2025. The overview distant analysis provided focus in the close reading, which consisted of in-depth examination of nine articles with high relevance to the research topic. Analysis. Throughout, the material findings were understood through the well-established Diffusion of Innovations (DOI) Theory and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), which provided explanations to how technologies are accepted and ideas spread in society. Results. Many heritage scholars seem to lack knowledge on both technical and sector-specific problems of AI, and AI-problems related to cultural heritage tend to be overlooked in scholarly literature. Conclusion. If heritage scholars are excluded from AI-based forums that address cultural heritage, concerns about bias, misinformation, and potential discrimination and marginalization of cultural groups and heritage arise.

Publication Details

Journal
DiVA (Linnaeus University)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bakom arkiv och samlingar : Varför diskuteras problemen med AI sällan inom kulturarvsforskning?

DiVA (Linnaeus University)
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Bakom arkiv och samlingar : Varför diskuteras problemen med AI sällan inom kulturarvsforskning?

article en

Abstract

Introduction. Recent research on cultural heritage was examined to explore the problems of AI in the heritage sector, including their impact on cultural heritage, their comparative representations, and how the heritage sector and broader computer science discourses approach these AI-issues differently. Methods. The combined hybrid text analysis method of exploratory nature consisted of distant and close reading approaches. Sources were 168 peer-reviewed articles from the Library & Information Science Collection (LISC) from 2020–2025. The overview distant analysis provided focus in the close reading, which consisted of in-depth examination of nine articles with high relevance to the research topic. Analysis. Throughout, the material findings were understood through the well-established Diffusion of Innovations (DOI) Theory and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), which provided explanations to how technologies are accepted and ideas spread in society. Results. Many heritage scholars seem to lack knowledge on both technical and sector-specific problems of AI, and AI-problems related to cultural heritage tend to be overlooked in scholarly literature. Conclusion. If heritage scholars are excluded from AI-based forums that address cultural heritage, concerns about bias, misinformation, and potential discrimination and marginalization of cultural groups and heritage arise.

DiVA (Linnaeus University)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.