Performance and segmental velocity in Olympic and Traditional Rowing: an analysis in female rowers at different intensities

Introduction: rowing power is one of the main factors that influences the increase in boat speed, and the increase in the speed of body segments enhances stroke velocity in Olympic Rowing. Objective: the objective of this study is to analyze the relationship between the velocity of each segment and performance at different stroke rates, and to examine the differences between Traditional Rowing and Olympic Rowing. Methodology: thirteen highly trained national-level female rowers performed sets at 18, 24, and 30 strokes per minute (spm) on rowing ergometers for both modalities. Video analysis was carried out using the Rower Up analysis system. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to establish relationships between segment velocity and rowing performance. The magnitude of the correlation coefficient was interpreted as trivial (<0.1), small (0.1–0.3), moderate (0.3–0.5), strong (0.5–0.7), very strong (0.7–0.9), and almost perfect/perfect (0.9–1). Results: Traditional Rowing shows significant correlations in the trunk at 18 spm (r=0.375; p<0.001), 24 spm (r=0.560; p<0.001) and at 30 spm (r=0.243; p=0.099). Arms shows significant correlation at 18 spm (r=0.476; p<0.001) and at 24 spm (r=0.257; p=0.005). Olympic Rowing shows significant correlations in the legs at 18 spm (r=0.448; p<0.001), 24 spm (r=0.584; p<0.001) and at 30 spm (r=0.531; p<0.001). Arms shows significant correlation at 30 spm (r=0.433; p<0.001). Conclusions: the velocity of the legs in Olympic Rowing showed higher correlation than in Traditional Rowing at all intensities, whereas the velocity of the trunk showed the opposite, where the trunk never correlated with performance.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-04-01
Primary Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance and segmental velocity in Olympic and Traditional Rowing: an analysis in female rowers at different intensities

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
article

Performance and segmental velocity in Olympic and Traditional Rowing: an analysis in female rowers at different intensities

article en

Abstract

Introduction: rowing power is one of the main factors that influences the increase in boat speed, and the increase in the speed of body segments enhances stroke velocity in Olympic Rowing. Objective: the objective of this study is to analyze the relationship between the velocity of each segment and performance at different stroke rates, and to examine the differences between Traditional Rowing and Olympic Rowing. Methodology: thirteen highly trained national-level female rowers performed sets at 18, 24, and 30 strokes per minute (spm) on rowing ergometers for both modalities. Video analysis was carried out using the Rower Up analysis system. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to establish relationships between segment velocity and rowing performance. The magnitude of the correlation coefficient was interpreted as trivial (<0.1), small (0.1–0.3), moderate (0.3–0.5), strong (0.5–0.7), very strong (0.7–0.9), and almost perfect/perfect (0.9–1). Results: Traditional Rowing shows significant correlations in the trunk at 18 spm (r=0.375; p<0.001), 24 spm (r=0.560; p<0.001) and at 30 spm (r=0.243; p=0.099). Arms shows significant correlation at 18 spm (r=0.476; p<0.001) and at 24 spm (r=0.257; p=0.005). Olympic Rowing shows significant correlations in the legs at 18 spm (r=0.448; p<0.001), 24 spm (r=0.584; p<0.001) and at 30 spm (r=0.531; p<0.001). Arms shows significant correlation at 30 spm (r=0.433; p<0.001). Conclusions: the velocity of the legs in Olympic Rowing showed higher correlation than in Traditional Rowing at all intensities, whereas the velocity of the trunk showed the opposite, where the trunk never correlated with performance.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.