Эколого-экономический диспаритет и гипотеза М. Портера в субъектах Российской Федерации

The article investigates the presence of ecological and economic disparity from the point of view of the Porter M. hypothesis. It complements the research that the costs of complying with environmental standards lead to an increase in economic efficiency, based on data from Russian regions. The methodology is based on a model for assessing the impact of environmental regulation on the productivity index. Environmental regulation refers to the cost of pollution control PACE, adjusted according to statistical data. The productivity index includes the dynamics of GDP, carbon dioxide emissions, labor force, capital investment and energy consumption. As a result, a direct relationship was found between the environmental regulation index and the productivity index. This proves the absence of ecological and economic disparity, that is, the costs of environmental protection do not reduce economic efficiency. The presented analysis methodology can be applied both at the macro level (of the region) and at the micro level of companies (including when evaluating the ESG strategy and environmental innovations)

Publication Details

Journal
SibFU Digital Repository (Siberian Federal University)
Published
2024-12-01
Primary Topic
Sharing Economy and Platforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Эколого-экономический диспаритет и гипотеза М. Портера в субъектах Российской Федерации

SibFU Digital Repository (Siberian Federal University)
Sharing Economy and Platforms
article

Эколого-экономический диспаритет и гипотеза М. Портера в субъектах Российской Федерации

article en

Abstract

The article investigates the presence of ecological and economic disparity from the point of view of the Porter M. hypothesis. It complements the research that the costs of complying with environmental standards lead to an increase in economic efficiency, based on data from Russian regions. The methodology is based on a model for assessing the impact of environmental regulation on the productivity index. Environmental regulation refers to the cost of pollution control PACE, adjusted according to statistical data. The productivity index includes the dynamics of GDP, carbon dioxide emissions, labor force, capital investment and energy consumption. As a result, a direct relationship was found between the environmental regulation index and the productivity index. This proves the absence of ecological and economic disparity, that is, the costs of environmental protection do not reduce economic efficiency. The presented analysis methodology can be applied both at the macro level (of the region) and at the micro level of companies (including when evaluating the ESG strategy and environmental innovations)

SibFU Digital Repository (Siberian Federal University)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Sharing Economy and Platforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.