إعادة تقييم لتفاسير قرآنية في ضوء اللسانيات الحديثة: دراسة تحليلية لآيتين قرآنيتين

This paper aims to compare between the available interpretations of two Qur’anic verses, seeking to demonstrate that some of the interpretations are plausible, while the others are untenable, in line with principles of modern linguistics. The plausible interpretations receive support from new linguistic analyses that are based on a new approach to the meanings derived from the phrases that include the relevant words. The paper shows that the phrase dābbatun mina l-ʼarḍ ‘a creature from the earth’ and the phrase dābbatu l-ʼarḍ ‘a creature of the earth (earthworm)’, in another verse, do not have the same meaning, contra the opinion of a contemporary scholar. As for the second verse, the paper argues that the phrase māʼin dāfiq ‘gushing water/liquid’ does not have the same meaning as the commonly confused phrase māʼu r-rajul ‘man’s water/liquid’. The paper supports the correct interpretations with independent evidence. Therefore, the paper aims to apply the relevant modern linguistic principles on Qur’anic verses, seeking to analyze them and provide new and insightful interpretations for them, interpretations that do not contradict the Holy Qur’an and the Prophet’s Sunnah.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

إعادة تقييم لتفاسير قرآنية في ضوء اللسانيات الحديثة: دراسة تحليلية لآيتين قرآنيتين

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
article

إعادة تقييم لتفاسير قرآنية في ضوء اللسانيات الحديثة: دراسة تحليلية لآيتين قرآنيتين

article en

Abstract

This paper aims to compare between the available interpretations of two Qur’anic verses, seeking to demonstrate that some of the interpretations are plausible, while the others are untenable, in line with principles of modern linguistics. The plausible interpretations receive support from new linguistic analyses that are based on a new approach to the meanings derived from the phrases that include the relevant words. The paper shows that the phrase dābbatun mina l-ʼarḍ ‘a creature from the earth’ and the phrase dābbatu l-ʼarḍ ‘a creature of the earth (earthworm)’, in another verse, do not have the same meaning, contra the opinion of a contemporary scholar. As for the second verse, the paper argues that the phrase māʼin dāfiq ‘gushing water/liquid’ does not have the same meaning as the commonly confused phrase māʼu r-rajul ‘man’s water/liquid’. The paper supports the correct interpretations with independent evidence. Therefore, the paper aims to apply the relevant modern linguistic principles on Qur’anic verses, seeking to analyze them and provide new and insightful interpretations for them, interpretations that do not contradict the Holy Qur’an and the Prophet’s Sunnah.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Sultan Qaboos University (OM)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.