ЕКСЕРГЕТИЧНИЙ АНАЛІЗ ПРОЦЕСІВ ТЕРМІЧНОЇ ПЕРЕРОБКИ ВУГІЛЛЯ

To develop energy-saving technologies and facilities that use coal, it is essential to evaluate the energy potential of the resulting products. Additionally, it is necessary to determine their suitability for specific technologies, processes, and installations. Alongside the energy method, it is proposed to use the exergy method, which allows for the assessment of not only the quantitative but also the qualitative aspects of thermal conversion processes. Thermal conversion methods such as combustion and gasification are of interest for both energy and industrial applications. The study includes calculations of the exergy efficiency of coal thermal conversion products, based on which material and exergy balances were compiled for the gasification process under air and oxygen blast conditions, as well as for the combustion process. An analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of process temperatures on the characteristics of coal thermal conversion products (composition, output, exergy). Additionally, the exergy efficiency coefficients (overall, chemical and physical exergy) for these thermal conversion methods were calculated. Based on the analysis, optimal operating modes for coal thermal conversion processes were determined, depending on the final goals of the obtained products. The advantages of high-temperature oxygen and air gasification were identified, characterized by low exergy losses (24.9–28.9 %) and high chemical potential (12–13.46 MJ/kg of coal). The exergy efficiency of the oxygen gasification process is 68.3–71.2 %, while for air gasification, it is 70.2– 76.3 %. It was also established that, to achieve the highest fuel utilization efficiency, it is advisable to utilize the heat of the produced syngas. The utilization of 1 MJ/kg of coal from the physical exergy of the gas increases the overall exergy efficiency of air gasification by 3.5 % and that of oxygen gasification by approximately 0.7 %. A comparison of the exergy efficiency of the processes was conducted, revealing that coal gasification is a more rational method of thermal conversion compared to traditional combustion. This is because the highest losses are observed during the combustion process, with an exergy efficiency of 64.8 %. During coal combustion, irreversible losses account for 35 % of its initial exergy.

Publication Details

Journal
The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy
Published
2024-12-30
Primary Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ЕКСЕРГЕТИЧНИЙ АНАЛІЗ ПРОЦЕСІВ ТЕРМІЧНОЇ ПЕРЕРОБКИ ВУГІЛЛЯ

The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
article

ЕКСЕРГЕТИЧНИЙ АНАЛІЗ ПРОЦЕСІВ ТЕРМІЧНОЇ ПЕРЕРОБКИ ВУГІЛЛЯ

article en

Abstract

To develop energy-saving technologies and facilities that use coal, it is essential to evaluate the energy potential of the resulting products. Additionally, it is necessary to determine their suitability for specific technologies, processes, and installations. Alongside the energy method, it is proposed to use the exergy method, which allows for the assessment of not only the quantitative but also the qualitative aspects of thermal conversion processes. Thermal conversion methods such as combustion and gasification are of interest for both energy and industrial applications. The study includes calculations of the exergy efficiency of coal thermal conversion products, based on which material and exergy balances were compiled for the gasification process under air and oxygen blast conditions, as well as for the combustion process. An analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of process temperatures on the characteristics of coal thermal conversion products (composition, output, exergy). Additionally, the exergy efficiency coefficients (overall, chemical and physical exergy) for these thermal conversion methods were calculated. Based on the analysis, optimal operating modes for coal thermal conversion processes were determined, depending on the final goals of the obtained products. The advantages of high-temperature oxygen and air gasification were identified, characterized by low exergy losses (24.9–28.9 %) and high chemical potential (12–13.46 MJ/kg of coal). The exergy efficiency of the oxygen gasification process is 68.3–71.2 %, while for air gasification, it is 70.2– 76.3 %. It was also established that, to achieve the highest fuel utilization efficiency, it is advisable to utilize the heat of the produced syngas. The utilization of 1 MJ/kg of coal from the physical exergy of the gas increases the overall exergy efficiency of air gasification by 3.5 % and that of oxygen gasification by approximately 0.7 %. A comparison of the exergy efficiency of the processes was conducted, revealing that coal gasification is a more rational method of thermal conversion compared to traditional combustion. This is because the highest losses are observed during the combustion process, with an exergy efficiency of 64.8 %. During coal combustion, irreversible losses account for 35 % of its initial exergy.

The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

ЕКСЕРГЕТИЧНИЙ АНАЛІЗ ПРОЦЕСІВ ТЕРМІЧНОЇ ПЕРЕРОБКИ ВУГІЛЛЯ · The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS