Understanding in-situ complexities: a scoping review on the trends of qualitative method design and practice in coach-athlete dialogue studies

<p dir="ltr">Sport pedagogue–learner interactions encompass complex dynamics of (who, what, when, where, why, and how) speaking and listening acts. As discursive practice normatively frames certain embodied, pedagogic, and socio-cultural values/biases beyond information transmission, coach–athlete dialogues (CADs) mediate their way of being-in-the-world across multi-dimensions. Recognising this significance, a growing body of qualitative coaching research has applied methodological creativity to seize the in-situ moments of CADs and grasp their emergent, contextual, and nuanced nature, instead of repeating the prominent tendency to manufacture CAD into half-stories of coaches’ behaviours as speakers or athletes’ perceptions as listeners. Nonetheless, the methodological trajectories of such qualitative research (i.e. extant progress, potential limitations, and possible future directions) have seldom been scrutinised. Therefore, this article presents a scoping review on the design and practice of qualitative methods used in 41 CAD studies published from 2000 to 2024. The analysis reveals four major themes: (i) instructor-centred perspective; (ii) space before place; (iii) insufficient attention to non-verbal language-use-in-interaction; and (iv) imbalance of emic–etic approaches. The findings are expected to provide qualitative coaching researchers with reflexive sources for their own and participants’ CAD-related reality (ontology) and knowledge (epistemology), especially when crafting the method design and practice to better uncover the in-situ complexities of sport coaching.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-04-23
Primary Topic
Sport Psychology and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding in-situ complexities: a scoping review on the trends of qualitative method design and practice in coach-athlete dialogue studies

Figshare
Sport Psychology and Performance
article

Understanding in-situ complexities: a scoping review on the trends of qualitative method design and practice in coach-athlete dialogue studies

article en

Abstract

<p dir="ltr">Sport pedagogue–learner interactions encompass complex dynamics of (who, what, when, where, why, and how) speaking and listening acts. As discursive practice normatively frames certain embodied, pedagogic, and socio-cultural values/biases beyond information transmission, coach–athlete dialogues (CADs) mediate their way of being-in-the-world across multi-dimensions. Recognising this significance, a growing body of qualitative coaching research has applied methodological creativity to seize the in-situ moments of CADs and grasp their emergent, contextual, and nuanced nature, instead of repeating the prominent tendency to manufacture CAD into half-stories of coaches’ behaviours as speakers or athletes’ perceptions as listeners. Nonetheless, the methodological trajectories of such qualitative research (i.e. extant progress, potential limitations, and possible future directions) have seldom been scrutinised. Therefore, this article presents a scoping review on the design and practice of qualitative methods used in 41 CAD studies published from 2000 to 2024. The analysis reveals four major themes: (i) instructor-centred perspective; (ii) space before place; (iii) insufficient attention to non-verbal language-use-in-interaction; and (iv) imbalance of emic–etic approaches. The findings are expected to provide qualitative coaching researchers with reflexive sources for their own and participants’ CAD-related reality (ontology) and knowledge (epistemology), especially when crafting the method design and practice to better uncover the in-situ complexities of sport coaching.

Figshare
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Sport Psychology and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.