The United Kingdom, Targeted Killing, International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law

It would appear that, to date, the United Kingdom (UK) has engaged in the targeted killing of suspected terrorists on the territory of a third State on four occasions—most recently in June 2024. In responding to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights 2015 Inquiry into a policy of targeted killing outside of armed conflict, the then Secretary of State for Defence, Michael Fallon, indicated that the appropriate legal framework for such drone strikes was international humanitarian law, and that compliance with international humanitarian law would result in compliance with any obligations that the UK also held in international human rights law. The position has been neither confirmed nor refuted since. This article assesses the accuracy of the statement, and finds that neither element is necessarily true.

Publication Details

Journal
Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull)
Published
2025-06-01
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The United Kingdom, Targeted Killing, International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law

Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull)
International Law and Human Rights
article

The United Kingdom, Targeted Killing, International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law

article en

Abstract

It would appear that, to date, the United Kingdom (UK) has engaged in the targeted killing of suspected terrorists on the territory of a third State on four occasions—most recently in June 2024. In responding to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights 2015 Inquiry into a policy of targeted killing outside of armed conflict, the then Secretary of State for Defence, Michael Fallon, indicated that the appropriate legal framework for such drone strikes was international humanitarian law, and that compliance with international humanitarian law would result in compliance with any obligations that the UK also held in international human rights law. The position has been neither confirmed nor refuted since. This article assesses the accuracy of the statement, and finds that neither element is necessarily true.

Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
International Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The United Kingdom, Targeted Killing, International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law · Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS