A user perspective on accessibility of INSPIRE datasets : An accessibility ranking of the average dataset in 2025 by country

There has been a push to open up data held by public authorities for the purposes of transparency and openness. In 1998, the EU and its Member States signed onto the Aarhus convention comitting to more open and transparent governance, resulting in the enshrinement of environmental democracy principles. The benefits provided by open data align well with environmental democracy principles. Nine years later, the EU pens the INSPIRE directive. INSPIRE aims to provide easy access to high quality datasets that serve as the basis for environmental policymaking. As dataset reuse has been highlighted as an important determinant of open data benefit realization, the importance of examining how INSPIRE may support an ordinary citizen’s right to know became clear. Dataset reuse is affected by quality control – a facet of which is accessibility. However, in 2016 a report stated that INSPIRE was behind schedule. Almost a decade later, there has been no studies on the accessibility of INSPIRE datasets, hindering the evaluation of INSPIRE as a promoter of environmental democracy. The goal of this study is to evaluate the accessibility of the average dataset in 10 EU/EFTA countries and determine if the accessibility is sufficient to support environmental democracy ambitions for ordinary citizens. To do this, we used a two-round approach, where we developed a formula for quantifying accessibility and a protocol to find INSPIRE datasets. These were improved upon in the second round and their effect on accessibility ratings were established. The main findings of this study are that the accessibility of chosen countries’ datasets is sufficient for smaller scale applications of environmental democracy. However, as the scale increases so do requirements for either software or multilingualism. Alongside these requirements, we identified that various barriers to access are present and should be remediated, most notably account and purchase requirements.

Publication Details

Journal
Dalarna University College Electronic Archive
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A user perspective on accessibility of INSPIRE datasets : An accessibility ranking of the average dataset in 2025 by country

Dalarna University College Electronic Archive
Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
article

A user perspective on accessibility of INSPIRE datasets : An accessibility ranking of the average dataset in 2025 by country

article en

Abstract

There has been a push to open up data held by public authorities for the purposes of transparency and openness. In 1998, the EU and its Member States signed onto the Aarhus convention comitting to more open and transparent governance, resulting in the enshrinement of environmental democracy principles. The benefits provided by open data align well with environmental democracy principles. Nine years later, the EU pens the INSPIRE directive. INSPIRE aims to provide easy access to high quality datasets that serve as the basis for environmental policymaking. As dataset reuse has been highlighted as an important determinant of open data benefit realization, the importance of examining how INSPIRE may support an ordinary citizen’s right to know became clear. Dataset reuse is affected by quality control – a facet of which is accessibility. However, in 2016 a report stated that INSPIRE was behind schedule. Almost a decade later, there has been no studies on the accessibility of INSPIRE datasets, hindering the evaluation of INSPIRE as a promoter of environmental democracy. The goal of this study is to evaluate the accessibility of the average dataset in 10 EU/EFTA countries and determine if the accessibility is sufficient to support environmental democracy ambitions for ordinary citizens. To do this, we used a two-round approach, where we developed a formula for quantifying accessibility and a protocol to find INSPIRE datasets. These were improved upon in the second round and their effect on accessibility ratings were established. The main findings of this study are that the accessibility of chosen countries’ datasets is sufficient for smaller scale applications of environmental democracy. However, as the scale increases so do requirements for either software or multilingualism. Alongside these requirements, we identified that various barriers to access are present and should be remediated, most notably account and purchase requirements.

Dalarna University College Electronic Archive
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.