Unlocking the power of generative AI in qualitative data analysis: a deep dive into data from a physical activity service evaluation

Qualitative Data Analysis (QDA) is essential in social sciences and human-computer interaction, involving the interpretation of unstructured data like interviews and surveys. Traditional QDA methods are labour-intensive and prone to human bias. Generative AI (GenAI) offers new possibilities for automating QDA through natural language processing. This study, using qualitative focus group data from a physical activity programme evaluation, as a case study, compares GenAI models with human-led analysis. Findings show GenAI significantly improves efficiency, reducing analysis time from nine hours to one hour with human validation. However, GenAI struggles with nuanced contextual understanding and human judgment. The paper concludes that GenAI can complement QDA by streamlining workflows while maintaining quality through human oversight, offering valuable insights into integrating AI in qualitative research.

Publication Details

Journal
London Met Repository (London Metropolitan University)
Published
2025-04-21
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unlocking the power of generative AI in qualitative data analysis: a deep dive into data from a physical activity service evaluation

London Met Repository (London Metropolitan University)
Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
article

Unlocking the power of generative AI in qualitative data analysis: a deep dive into data from a physical activity service evaluation

article en

Abstract

Qualitative Data Analysis (QDA) is essential in social sciences and human-computer interaction, involving the interpretation of unstructured data like interviews and surveys. Traditional QDA methods are labour-intensive and prone to human bias. Generative AI (GenAI) offers new possibilities for automating QDA through natural language processing. This study, using qualitative focus group data from a physical activity programme evaluation, as a case study, compares GenAI models with human-led analysis. Findings show GenAI significantly improves efficiency, reducing analysis time from nine hours to one hour with human validation. However, GenAI struggles with nuanced contextual understanding and human judgment. The paper concludes that GenAI can complement QDA by streamlining workflows while maintaining quality through human oversight, offering valuable insights into integrating AI in qualitative research.

London Met Repository (London Metropolitan University)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.