Understanding Inter-Agency Decision Making Processes of Prescribed Fire in Western Montana

Fire suppression, climate change, and increasing human presence in wildland-urban interfaces challenge land managers in implementing prescribed fire. This study examines the temporal and spatial dimensions of prescribed fire decision-making, current information sources, and gaps in knowledge. Limited understanding exists regarding the specific information needs of wildfire managers to determine timing and location. Decision-making insights can inform risk reduction and fire mitigation strategies, including when and where to burn and its impact on human well-being. We will conduct qualitative, semi-structured interviews with prescribed fire decision-makers in Western Montana, using a chain referral sampling approach to reach at least 30 participants. Data analysis will involve open coding in NVivo, thematic identification, and triangulation for validation. Findings will be shared with participants for further refinement. Preliminary results indicate fire managers are frustrated with the prescribed burn process, citing poor public communication, unmet burn goals, staffing shortages, and increasing liability concerns. Overall, our research highlights the need for improved decision-making processes, enhanced communication about prescribed fire, and better recruitment strategies for qualified staff.