UNA CORTE SUPREMAMENTE INSEGURA: SOBRE CRITERIOS E INTERPRETACIONES DE NUESTRO MÁS ALTO TRIBUNAL DE JUSTICIA SOBRE EL MODIFICADO ARTÍCULO 84 DEL CÓDIGO PENAL PERUANO

During 2023, the Criminal Code has been object of multiple modifications. That of article 84 has been one of the most relevant, which established a one-year peremptory period of suspension of the criminal action. Although it has generated a special controversy in the political and academic spheres, the Criminal Chambers of the Supreme Court of Justice agreed on is unquestionable application, as stated in its most recent jurisprudence issued between June and October of this year. However, on November 28th, 2023, the Plenary Agreement N.° 05-2023/ CIJ-112 was published, through which the same Tribunals that applied the modified article, raised its unconstitutionality as a legal doctrine. Such an abrupt change in criteria not only promotes legal uncertainty, but also proposes the permanence of an irrational conception of the calculation of the suspension period, which comes incompatible with the reasonable period right.

Publication Details

Journal
Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Penology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

UNA CORTE SUPREMAMENTE INSEGURA: SOBRE CRITERIOS E INTERPRETACIONES DE NUESTRO MÁS ALTO TRIBUNAL DE JUSTICIA SOBRE EL MODIFICADO ARTÍCULO 84 DEL CÓDIGO PENAL PERUANO

Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Criminal Justice and Penology
article

UNA CORTE SUPREMAMENTE INSEGURA: SOBRE CRITERIOS E INTERPRETACIONES DE NUESTRO MÁS ALTO TRIBUNAL DE JUSTICIA SOBRE EL MODIFICADO ARTÍCULO 84 DEL CÓDIGO PENAL PERUANO

article en

Abstract

During 2023, the Criminal Code has been object of multiple modifications. That of article 84 has been one of the most relevant, which established a one-year peremptory period of suspension of the criminal action. Although it has generated a special controversy in the political and academic spheres, the Criminal Chambers of the Supreme Court of Justice agreed on is unquestionable application, as stated in its most recent jurisprudence issued between June and October of this year. However, on November 28th, 2023, the Plenary Agreement N.° 05-2023/ CIJ-112 was published, through which the same Tribunals that applied the modified article, raised its unconstitutionality as a legal doctrine. Such an abrupt change in criteria not only promotes legal uncertainty, but also proposes the permanence of an irrational conception of the calculation of the suspension period, which comes incompatible with the reasonable period right.

Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Criminal Justice and Penology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.