The syntax-prosody interface in LFG:Revisiting Korean question focus

This paper sets out two challenges to LFG analyses of the syntax-prosody interface—one general, one specific—arising from experimental evidence that shows considerable hearer variation in the interpretation of specific prosodic patterns in Korean that are canonically associated with the scope of question focus. We assume that this arises from a lexical preference for the question word reading of content pro-forms that are ambiguous between question words and indefinite pronouns, which has an effect on how pitch contours are perceived. A revised formal treatment of the phenomenon, building on Jones (2016) is presented, which robustly handles the variation in hearer perception and links to ongoing work to model hearers’ decision-making process.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology)
Published
2024-12-31
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The syntax-prosody interface in LFG:Revisiting Korean question focus

University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology)
Phonetics and Phonology Research
article

The syntax-prosody interface in LFG:Revisiting Korean question focus

article en

Abstract

This paper sets out two challenges to LFG analyses of the syntax-prosody interface—one general, one specific—arising from experimental evidence that shows considerable hearer variation in the interpretation of specific prosodic patterns in Korean that are canonically associated with the scope of question focus. We assume that this arises from a lexical preference for the question word reading of content pro-forms that are ambiguous between question words and indefinite pronouns, which has an effect on how pitch contours are perceived. A revised formal treatment of the phenomenon, building on Jones (2016) is presented, which robustly handles the variation in hearer perception and links to ongoing work to model hearers’ decision-making process.

University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology)
Wellesley College (US), Newcastle University (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.