Svensk beredskap - en beredskap för alla? En undersokning om personer med funktionsnedsattningar i svenska strategier for krisberedskap

People with disabilities have throughout history been more vulnerable in crisis and disaster contexts. This has mainly been due to exclusion and failure in understanding the needs of people with disabilities. The purpose of this essay has been to examine Swedish strategies for crisis management and inclusion of people with disabilities. Previous research has suggested that people with disabilities are more vulnerable and affected disproportionately by crises and disasters, as a result of poorly adapted infrastructure, warning systems and failing to understand the needs of people with disabilities. The theory that has been used for the essay is Brenda D. Philipps’ inclusive emergency management, which sets certain factors that needs to be met in order for emergency management to be considered inclusive. This has been applied to material from the Swedish agencies MSB and Socialstyrelsen through a qualitative content analysis. The findings that were presented suggested that Swedish crisis management, through MSB and Socialstyrelsen, failed to meet all the requirements for inclusive emergency management and, therefore, can not be seen as fully inclusive. Thus the contribution of this essay is to be seen as an understanding of the lack of inclusion of people with disabilities in Swedish crisis management, and hopefully lead to actions toward inclusion. Further research could delve into the regional and local level of management and the potential inclusion (or exclusion) there, as well as compare Sweden with another country in terms of inclusion.

Publication Details

Journal
KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Svensk beredskap - en beredskap för alla? En undersokning om personer med funktionsnedsattningar i svenska strategier for krisberedskap

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

Svensk beredskap - en beredskap för alla? En undersokning om personer med funktionsnedsattningar i svenska strategier for krisberedskap

article en

Abstract

People with disabilities have throughout history been more vulnerable in crisis and disaster contexts. This has mainly been due to exclusion and failure in understanding the needs of people with disabilities. The purpose of this essay has been to examine Swedish strategies for crisis management and inclusion of people with disabilities. Previous research has suggested that people with disabilities are more vulnerable and affected disproportionately by crises and disasters, as a result of poorly adapted infrastructure, warning systems and failing to understand the needs of people with disabilities. The theory that has been used for the essay is Brenda D. Philipps’ inclusive emergency management, which sets certain factors that needs to be met in order for emergency management to be considered inclusive. This has been applied to material from the Swedish agencies MSB and Socialstyrelsen through a qualitative content analysis. The findings that were presented suggested that Swedish crisis management, through MSB and Socialstyrelsen, failed to meet all the requirements for inclusive emergency management and, therefore, can not be seen as fully inclusive. Thus the contribution of this essay is to be seen as an understanding of the lack of inclusion of people with disabilities in Swedish crisis management, and hopefully lead to actions toward inclusion. Further research could delve into the regional and local level of management and the potential inclusion (or exclusion) there, as well as compare Sweden with another country in terms of inclusion.

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.