Study participation in clozapine-resistant psychosis: a case study on decision-making capacity

Informed consent is a requirement for medical research. Obtaining consent can be complex in patients with severe psychiatric disorders, often leading to their exclusion from study participation. Here, we discuss a case involving a patient with clozapine-resistant schizophrenia, highlighting the different perspectives of caregivers and physician-researchers, with an emphasis on decision-making capacity. The case illustrates the complexity of informed consent in this population, including the challenges in assessing decision-making capacity, ethical dilemmas, and potential improvements. We conclude that improving existing standardized assessment tools, promoting inclusive approaches to research participation, and supporting patient representation in decision-making processes can contribute to the quality and integrity of medical research involving individuals with the most severe forms of psychiatric disorders.

Publication Details

Journal
Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)
Published
2024-10-01
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Study participation in clozapine-resistant psychosis: a case study on decision-making capacity

Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Study participation in clozapine-resistant psychosis: a case study on decision-making capacity

article en

Abstract

Informed consent is a requirement for medical research. Obtaining consent can be complex in patients with severe psychiatric disorders, often leading to their exclusion from study participation. Here, we discuss a case involving a patient with clozapine-resistant schizophrenia, highlighting the different perspectives of caregivers and physician-researchers, with an emphasis on decision-making capacity. The case illustrates the complexity of informed consent in this population, including the challenges in assessing decision-making capacity, ethical dilemmas, and potential improvements. We conclude that improving existing standardized assessment tools, promoting inclusive approaches to research participation, and supporting patient representation in decision-making processes can contribute to the quality and integrity of medical research involving individuals with the most severe forms of psychiatric disorders.

Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.