Social Cohesion and Aesthetic Expressions : A Liberal Approach and Conservative Critique

The liberal view on culture is mostly pluralist. However, liberals also hold the view that social cohesion is necessary in order to maintain a liberal society. Conservatives too, hold social cohesion as central. Yet, they have a more expansive view of what can be expected of citizens in order to maintain social cohesion. To illustrate the difference between these ideologies, I ask if liberals can accept public intervention into the aesthetic parts of people’s lives. This question presupposes a division of cultural expressions into the aesthetic (having to do with taste) and ethical (normative principles). Liberals maintain a unified front against conservatives. Conservatives see aesthetics as intertwined with national culture and moral, meaning that social cohesion is contingent on aesthetic unity. Liberals reject this perception of intertwined tenets. Instead, liberals require, at most, an allegiance to the social order in order to maintain social cohesion. This leaves aesthetics to be as diverse as they please, with one caveat. Liberals should reject aesthetic expression when they constitute a substantive restriction to others.

Publication Details

Journal
KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social Cohesion and Aesthetic Expressions : A Liberal Approach and Conservative Critique

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
article

Social Cohesion and Aesthetic Expressions : A Liberal Approach and Conservative Critique

article en

Abstract

The liberal view on culture is mostly pluralist. However, liberals also hold the view that social cohesion is necessary in order to maintain a liberal society. Conservatives too, hold social cohesion as central. Yet, they have a more expansive view of what can be expected of citizens in order to maintain social cohesion. To illustrate the difference between these ideologies, I ask if liberals can accept public intervention into the aesthetic parts of people’s lives. This question presupposes a division of cultural expressions into the aesthetic (having to do with taste) and ethical (normative principles). Liberals maintain a unified front against conservatives. Conservatives see aesthetics as intertwined with national culture and moral, meaning that social cohesion is contingent on aesthetic unity. Liberals reject this perception of intertwined tenets. Instead, liberals require, at most, an allegiance to the social order in order to maintain social cohesion. This leaves aesthetics to be as diverse as they please, with one caveat. Liberals should reject aesthetic expression when they constitute a substantive restriction to others.

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Social Cohesion and Aesthetic Expressions : A Liberal Approach and Conservative Critique · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS