Smartphone-Based CameraTraps: On-Device Wildlife Detection : Comparing Detection Accuracy, Bandwidth Efficiency, and Per-formance Against Traditional Camera Traps

Wildlife monitoring plays a critical role in conservation efforts, enabling the tracking of species, the detection of illegal activities such as poaching, and a better understanding of animal behaviours. While traditional camera traps have proven effective, they encounter limitations, particularly regarding bandwidth, when relying on cloud-based systems for data transmission and processing. This thesis investigates the feasibility of replacing conventional digital camera traps with smartphone-based systems for wildlife monitoring. To explore this, a mobile proof-of-concept application incorporating the MegaDetector model for on-device object detection was developed. The system was supported by a custom database and web application for data handling and analysis. Field testing was conducted at Kolmården Wildlife Park, where the new smartphone-based system was compared against the Qulinda camera trap solution. Evaluation metrics included detection accuracy, long-distance performance, and bandwidth efficiency. The results show that the smartphone-based system consistently outperformed the Qulinda model, achieving higher precision (0.981 at a 50% confidence threshold), particularly in animal detection at varying distances. The system also improved bandwidth efficiency by uploading only positively identified frames, although some image redundancy persisted. Challenges encountered included class imbalance in detection data, battery limitations, and environmental factors affecting hardware performance. The study demonstrates that low-cost, mobile-based solutions can effectively support wildlife conservation and serve as a viable alternative to traditional camera traps.

Publication Details

Journal
KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Smartphone-Based CameraTraps: On-Device Wildlife Detection : Comparing Detection Accuracy, Bandwidth Efficiency, and Per-formance Against Traditional Camera Traps

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Smartphone-Based CameraTraps: On-Device Wildlife Detection : Comparing Detection Accuracy, Bandwidth Efficiency, and Per-formance Against Traditional Camera Traps

article en

Abstract

Wildlife monitoring plays a critical role in conservation efforts, enabling the tracking of species, the detection of illegal activities such as poaching, and a better understanding of animal behaviours. While traditional camera traps have proven effective, they encounter limitations, particularly regarding bandwidth, when relying on cloud-based systems for data transmission and processing. This thesis investigates the feasibility of replacing conventional digital camera traps with smartphone-based systems for wildlife monitoring. To explore this, a mobile proof-of-concept application incorporating the MegaDetector model for on-device object detection was developed. The system was supported by a custom database and web application for data handling and analysis. Field testing was conducted at Kolmården Wildlife Park, where the new smartphone-based system was compared against the Qulinda camera trap solution. Evaluation metrics included detection accuracy, long-distance performance, and bandwidth efficiency. The results show that the smartphone-based system consistently outperformed the Qulinda model, achieving higher precision (0.981 at a 50% confidence threshold), particularly in animal detection at varying distances. The system also improved bandwidth efficiency by uploading only positively identified frames, although some image redundancy persisted. Challenges encountered included class imbalance in detection data, battery limitations, and environmental factors affecting hardware performance. The study demonstrates that low-cost, mobile-based solutions can effectively support wildlife conservation and serve as a viable alternative to traditional camera traps.

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Smartphone-Based CameraTraps: On-Device Wildlife Detection : Comparing Detection Accuracy, Bandwidth Efficiency, and Per-formance Against Traditional Camera Traps · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS