Reliability and Validity Evaluation of the RAT-43 Psychological Resilience Scale in Chinese Adolescents

Objectives: To assess the level of psychological resilience among Chinese college students, this study introduces the Resilience Assessment Tool 43 (RAT-43), developed by Amalia bt Madihie and Siti Norazilah Mohd Said. Based on the "Magic Box Model" [2], the tool encompasses five dimensions: foundation, belonging, learning, coping, and core self, and has demonstrated good reliability and validity in countries such as Malaysia and Iran (Amalia, 2017). However, the applicability of RAT-43 in the Chinese college student population has not been thoroughly investigated. Methods: Therefore, this study, using a sample of college students from Guizhou, employs a questionnaire survey method, combined with exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, to examine the structural validity of RAT-43 in the Chinese cultural context. Results:Cronbach's α coefficient and test-retest reliability are used to assess its internal consistency and stability.The results indicate that RAT-43 demonstrates good applicability among Chinese college students and can effectively assess psychological resilience levels. Conclusions: This finding not only fills the gap in research on the applicability of RAT-43 in the Chinese cultural context but also provides a scientific basis for mental health education in higher education. By understanding students' psychological resilience levels, educators can develop more targeted intervention measures to help students enhance their mental health and overall adaptability, thereby better coping with academic pressures and life challenges

Publication Details

Journal
Unimas Institutional Repository (Universiti Malaysia Sarawak)
Published
2025-03-01
Primary Topic
Resilience and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability and Validity Evaluation of the RAT-43 Psychological Resilience Scale in Chinese Adolescents

Unimas Institutional Repository (Universiti Malaysia Sarawak)
Resilience and Mental Health
article

Reliability and Validity Evaluation of the RAT-43 Psychological Resilience Scale in Chinese Adolescents

article en

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the level of psychological resilience among Chinese college students, this study introduces the Resilience Assessment Tool 43 (RAT-43), developed by Amalia bt Madihie and Siti Norazilah Mohd Said. Based on the "Magic Box Model" [2], the tool encompasses five dimensions: foundation, belonging, learning, coping, and core self, and has demonstrated good reliability and validity in countries such as Malaysia and Iran (Amalia, 2017). However, the applicability of RAT-43 in the Chinese college student population has not been thoroughly investigated. Methods: Therefore, this study, using a sample of college students from Guizhou, employs a questionnaire survey method, combined with exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, to examine the structural validity of RAT-43 in the Chinese cultural context. Results:Cronbach's α coefficient and test-retest reliability are used to assess its internal consistency and stability.The results indicate that RAT-43 demonstrates good applicability among Chinese college students and can effectively assess psychological resilience levels. Conclusions: This finding not only fills the gap in research on the applicability of RAT-43 in the Chinese cultural context but also provides a scientific basis for mental health education in higher education. By understanding students' psychological resilience levels, educators can develop more targeted intervention measures to help students enhance their mental health and overall adaptability, thereby better coping with academic pressures and life challenges

Unimas Institutional Repository (Universiti Malaysia Sarawak)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Resilience and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.