Representación y popularidad: la soberanía y la cuestión de la democracia en el Leviatán de Hobbes

Starting from the idea that modern democracy is only possible in its representative aspect, without this degenerating the principle of popular government, the concept of political representation becomes key to understanding political modernity. In this sense, Pitkin points out that the approach to this notion faces a problem based on the political thought of Hobbes, who –despite establishing the distinctions between author and actor– incurs the difficult postulation of absolute sovereignty that would make the idea of representation itself disappear. Beyond the usual characterization of Hobbesian thought as antidemocratic, the proposal of this text is to trace the use of the concept of democracy in Leviathan, thinking of it as one of the possible forms of government that absolute sovereignty can assume. On the one hand, the risks of the notions of ambition and popularity of subjects are investigated, as a key concern of Hobbesian objections to democracy. On the other hand, distinguishing the concept of Hobbesian authorization from the idea of “representation” of the interests of the people as a mission of the sovereign, the question of representativeness is raised as a key element of the stability of the political order. Finally, the relevance of Hobbesian concerns to present-day democratic processes is explored.

Publication Details

Journal
Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Representación y popularidad: la soberanía y la cuestión de la democracia en el Leviatán de Hobbes

Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
article

Representación y popularidad: la soberanía y la cuestión de la democracia en el Leviatán de Hobbes

article en

Abstract

Starting from the idea that modern democracy is only possible in its representative aspect, without this degenerating the principle of popular government, the concept of political representation becomes key to understanding political modernity. In this sense, Pitkin points out that the approach to this notion faces a problem based on the political thought of Hobbes, who –despite establishing the distinctions between author and actor– incurs the difficult postulation of absolute sovereignty that would make the idea of representation itself disappear. Beyond the usual characterization of Hobbesian thought as antidemocratic, the proposal of this text is to trace the use of the concept of democracy in Leviathan, thinking of it as one of the possible forms of government that absolute sovereignty can assume. On the one hand, the risks of the notions of ambition and popularity of subjects are investigated, as a key concern of Hobbesian objections to democracy. On the other hand, distinguishing the concept of Hobbesian authorization from the idea of “representation” of the interests of the people as a mission of the sovereign, the question of representativeness is raised as a key element of the stability of the political order. Finally, the relevance of Hobbesian concerns to present-day democratic processes is explored.

Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.