Public-Private Partnerships After Murthy v. Missouri

This Essay considers the future of public-private collaboration in the wake of the Murthy v. Missouri litigation, which cast doubt on the constitutionality of information sharing between federal agencies and social media companies. The litigation has been a good and a bad teacher. On one hand, the lower court decisions made legible the risks to free expression, accountability, transparency, and intimate privacy posed by government-industry collaborations. On the other hand, the litigation chilled information sharing between federal agencies, state election officials, and social media companies at the moment that such collaboration could and should help protect against foreign malign influence operations designed to undermine the integrity of the 2024 elections and beyond. We must rebuild public-private collaborations that protect democratic processes, guided by these lessons. Government can work cooperatively with tech companies without sacrificing free speech, but it must do so with commitments to accountability, transparency, and intimate privacy in mind.

Publication Details

Journal
Indiana law journal
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Law, Rights, and Freedoms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public-Private Partnerships After Murthy v. Missouri

Indiana law journal
Law, Rights, and Freedoms
article

Public-Private Partnerships After Murthy v. Missouri

article en

Abstract

This Essay considers the future of public-private collaboration in the wake of the Murthy v. Missouri litigation, which cast doubt on the constitutionality of information sharing between federal agencies and social media companies. The litigation has been a good and a bad teacher. On one hand, the lower court decisions made legible the risks to free expression, accountability, transparency, and intimate privacy posed by government-industry collaborations. On the other hand, the litigation chilled information sharing between federal agencies, state election officials, and social media companies at the moment that such collaboration could and should help protect against foreign malign influence operations designed to undermine the integrity of the 2024 elections and beyond. We must rebuild public-private collaborations that protect democratic processes, guided by these lessons. Government can work cooperatively with tech companies without sacrificing free speech, but it must do so with commitments to accountability, transparency, and intimate privacy in mind.

Indiana law journal
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Law, Rights, and Freedoms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.