Scaffolding the Understanding of Scientific Analogies

Analogy is a mainstay in STEM education. It benefits learning by highlighting important commonalities between concepts and promoting transfer of knowledge. However, students often fail to process analogies deeply, and thus miss the potential benefits. This research aims to equip students with a domain-general strategy for understanding analogies. We created an Analogy Template that guides students through an explicit analysis of the relational matches and object correspondences. To test its effects, we gave undergraduates a series of science analogies. The Training group used the template to analyze the analogies. The Control group explained the same analogies without the template. Then both groups were asked to explain four novel science analogies. Raters blind to condition judged the explanations. Students who successfully completed the template training showed better understanding of the analogies than those in the control group. These results provide initial evidence that analogical training can contribute to science understanding.

Publication Details

Journal
eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scaffolding the Understanding of Scientific Analogies

eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

Scaffolding the Understanding of Scientific Analogies

article en

Abstract

Analogy is a mainstay in STEM education. It benefits learning by highlighting important commonalities between concepts and promoting transfer of knowledge. However, students often fail to process analogies deeply, and thus miss the potential benefits. This research aims to equip students with a domain-general strategy for understanding analogies. We created an Analogy Template that guides students through an explicit analysis of the relational matches and object correspondences. To test its effects, we gave undergraduates a series of science analogies. The Training group used the template to analyze the analogies. The Control group explained the same analogies without the template. Then both groups were asked to explain four novel science analogies. Raters blind to condition judged the explanations. Students who successfully completed the template training showed better understanding of the analogies than those in the control group. These results provide initial evidence that analogical training can contribute to science understanding.

eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.