Predicting Soil Temperature at different depths using a Time Series Model

Soil temperature is vital for agriculture, especially in the area where winter is very harsh. Previously it was assumed that the ground surface temperature may affect the surface air temperature. But now this assumption does not hold. Other factors affect the ground surface temperature. In our proposed approach we use the data from the Red River Basin of Fargo North Dakota. The Red River Basin is very fertile land for agriculture and the soil is covered with snow. The data set consists of different features like Average Air Temperature, Average Relative Humidity, Average wind speed, Average Wind Direction, Total soil Radiation, Rainfall, Snow depth and Moisture content. Our objective is to find the features most important for predicting the soil temperature at different depths. In our proposed approach we will be implementing a machine learning model. As the LSTM (Long Short Term Memory) model works best on time series datasets, the authors in paper [1] have chosen to use the LSTM model. Here in our proposed work, we argued that we could also achieve a similar or better efficiency using machine learning model. Additionally, our model will be easier to implement and understand. On the other hand, LSTM models are difficult to implement. The LSTM model only accepts datasets if they are divided into two arguments. One is the dataset and the other is lookback which is the number of previous time steps to use as the input variables to predict the next time period. When using machine learning models we do not have to restructure our dataset. Additionally, In the paper [1] the authors only used the basic SHAP[2] framework which is the bar plot. The features are ordered from the highest to lowest effect on the prediction. It takes into account only the absolute SHAP values. Hence it is not possible to know if a feature is affecting the prediction in a positive or negative way. In our approach, we will be using beeswarm plot to understand in detail each of the features. That is if a feature is affecting the prediction positively or negatively. In summary, our proposed approach will be using machine learning models to look into the features in more detail about the prediction of the snow depths.

Publication Details

Journal
Open PRAIRIE (South Dakota State University)
Published
2025-02-07
Primary Topic
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting Soil Temperature at different depths using a Time Series Model

Open PRAIRIE (South Dakota State University)
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
article

Predicting Soil Temperature at different depths using a Time Series Model

article en

Abstract

Soil temperature is vital for agriculture, especially in the area where winter is very harsh. Previously it was assumed that the ground surface temperature may affect the surface air temperature. But now this assumption does not hold. Other factors affect the ground surface temperature. In our proposed approach we use the data from the Red River Basin of Fargo North Dakota. The Red River Basin is very fertile land for agriculture and the soil is covered with snow. The data set consists of different features like Average Air Temperature, Average Relative Humidity, Average wind speed, Average Wind Direction, Total soil Radiation, Rainfall, Snow depth and Moisture content. Our objective is to find the features most important for predicting the soil temperature at different depths. In our proposed approach we will be implementing a machine learning model. As the LSTM (Long Short Term Memory) model works best on time series datasets, the authors in paper [1] have chosen to use the LSTM model. Here in our proposed work, we argued that we could also achieve a similar or better efficiency using machine learning model. Additionally, our model will be easier to implement and understand. On the other hand, LSTM models are difficult to implement. The LSTM model only accepts datasets if they are divided into two arguments. One is the dataset and the other is lookback which is the number of previous time steps to use as the input variables to predict the next time period. When using machine learning models we do not have to restructure our dataset. Additionally, In the paper [1] the authors only used the basic SHAP[2] framework which is the bar plot. The features are ordered from the highest to lowest effect on the prediction. It takes into account only the absolute SHAP values. Hence it is not possible to know if a feature is affecting the prediction in a positive or negative way. In our approach, we will be using beeswarm plot to understand in detail each of the features. That is if a feature is affecting the prediction positively or negatively. In summary, our proposed approach will be using machine learning models to look into the features in more detail about the prediction of the snow depths.

Open PRAIRIE (South Dakota State University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.