Remedial Options after the Destruction of the Juukan Gorge Caves: A Lost Cause (of Action)?

This chapter examines the availability of remedies in international law following the destruction of the Juukan Gorge Caves in Australia by the mining company Rio Tinto. It addresses how a claim based on the prohibition on the intentional destruction of the cultural heritage of humankind would be received in different international dispute resolution fora. This approach is necessary because there is not dedicated dispute resolution forum that can resolve disputes regarding the prohibition. The chapter argues that international dispute resolution fora do not possess the requisite attributes to provide a remedy. In part, this is due to Rio Tinto's corporate structure. Thus, the chapter concludes that domestic legal frameworks must give effect to the prohibition on the intentional destruction of the cultural heritage of humankind to create remedies. However, despite recent legislative reforms, Australia's legal framework does not provide remedial options should a similar event occur in future.<p></p>

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-09-09
Primary Topic
Corporate Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Remedial Options after the Destruction of the Juukan Gorge Caves: A Lost Cause (of Action)?

Figshare
Corporate Law and Human Rights
article

Remedial Options after the Destruction of the Juukan Gorge Caves: A Lost Cause (of Action)?

article en

Abstract

This chapter examines the availability of remedies in international law following the destruction of the Juukan Gorge Caves in Australia by the mining company Rio Tinto. It addresses how a claim based on the prohibition on the intentional destruction of the cultural heritage of humankind would be received in different international dispute resolution fora. This approach is necessary because there is not dedicated dispute resolution forum that can resolve disputes regarding the prohibition. The chapter argues that international dispute resolution fora do not possess the requisite attributes to provide a remedy. In part, this is due to Rio Tinto's corporate structure. Thus, the chapter concludes that domestic legal frameworks must give effect to the prohibition on the intentional destruction of the cultural heritage of humankind to create remedies. However, despite recent legislative reforms, Australia's legal framework does not provide remedial options should a similar event occur in future.<p></p>

Figshare
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Corporate Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.