Prosodic and other paralinguistic features of speech differ across social contexts and roles

Prosodic (e.g., pitch, rhythm) and other paralinguistic features (e.g., laughter) shape speech dynamics, but the ways in which different communicative demands, such as social context and role, influence these features remain unclear. Using a podcast corpus, we analyzed speech across two contexts (monologue and dialogue) and roles (host and guest). We extracted 18 prosodic features (across pitch, rhythm, loudness, timbre, and voice quality) and annotated several paralinguistic features: proportion of laughter, proportion of interjections, and response offsets (inter-speaker gaps). Prosody differed reliably across contexts, such that dialogue exhibited more variable pitch, faster rhythm, narrower loudness range, more stable timbre, and rougher voice quality than monologue. Speakers also laughed more during dialogue than monologue. Additionally, hosts tended to laugh more and interject less than guests, but both groups had similar response offsets. Ongoing analyses will investigate role-based prosodic differences and the continuous relationship between these features and semantic meaning.

Publication Details

Journal
eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prosodic and other paralinguistic features of speech differ across social contexts and roles

eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
article

Prosodic and other paralinguistic features of speech differ across social contexts and roles

article en

Abstract

Prosodic (e.g., pitch, rhythm) and other paralinguistic features (e.g., laughter) shape speech dynamics, but the ways in which different communicative demands, such as social context and role, influence these features remain unclear. Using a podcast corpus, we analyzed speech across two contexts (monologue and dialogue) and roles (host and guest). We extracted 18 prosodic features (across pitch, rhythm, loudness, timbre, and voice quality) and annotated several paralinguistic features: proportion of laughter, proportion of interjections, and response offsets (inter-speaker gaps). Prosody differed reliably across contexts, such that dialogue exhibited more variable pitch, faster rhythm, narrower loudness range, more stable timbre, and rougher voice quality than monologue. Speakers also laughed more during dialogue than monologue. Additionally, hosts tended to laugh more and interject less than guests, but both groups had similar response offsets. Ongoing analyses will investigate role-based prosodic differences and the continuous relationship between these features and semantic meaning.

eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.