Reexamining Trade Secrecy for Privacy: Transparency in AI-Generated Inferences

Businesses today collect vast amounts of personal data to generate inferences that predict consumer behavior, optimize engagement, and drive sales. While this practice is highly profitable, it raises serious privacy concerns—especially when individuals remain unaware of the inferences drawn about them or are denied meaningful control over their personal data. Although frameworks like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) recognize inferences about individuals as personal data, companies frequently invoke trade secret protections to withhold access to these inferences, limiting transparency. As data analytics technologies evolve, so too do the risks of privacy loss, discrimination, and manipulation. This Dissertation explores the intersection of trade secrecy and data protection law, focusing on the legal and practical tensions that arise in the context of inference generation. Chapter 2 lays the foundation by examining the growing significance of inference practices and the legal barriers—especially those under EU and U.S. law—that restrict consumer access to their inferences. It calls for a critical reassessment of trade secret doctrine in light of personal data rights. Chapter 3 traces the historical evolution of trade secret law, highlighting its shift from protecting fair competition to shielding data from consumers and public oversight. Chapter 4 proposes legal and policy reforms to recalibrate trade secret protections when they conflict with privacy rights. It draws lessons from other intellectual property regimes and suggests accountability mechanisms to strengthen data controllers' obligations in responding to access requests. Chapter 5 serves as a “test suite,” evaluating the practical and legal challenges of implementing a meaningful Right of Access to Inferences. Finally, Chapter 6 synthesizes the findings and calls on policymakers to re-examine the boundaries between trade secrecy and privacy law, urging a more transparent, rights-respecting digital ecosystem.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2025-05-01
Primary Topic
Cultural Identity and Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reexamining Trade Secrecy for Privacy: Transparency in AI-Generated Inferences

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Cultural Identity and Heritage
article

Reexamining Trade Secrecy for Privacy: Transparency in AI-Generated Inferences

article en

Abstract

Businesses today collect vast amounts of personal data to generate inferences that predict consumer behavior, optimize engagement, and drive sales. While this practice is highly profitable, it raises serious privacy concerns—especially when individuals remain unaware of the inferences drawn about them or are denied meaningful control over their personal data. Although frameworks like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) recognize inferences about individuals as personal data, companies frequently invoke trade secret protections to withhold access to these inferences, limiting transparency. As data analytics technologies evolve, so too do the risks of privacy loss, discrimination, and manipulation. This Dissertation explores the intersection of trade secrecy and data protection law, focusing on the legal and practical tensions that arise in the context of inference generation. Chapter 2 lays the foundation by examining the growing significance of inference practices and the legal barriers—especially those under EU and U.S. law—that restrict consumer access to their inferences. It calls for a critical reassessment of trade secret doctrine in light of personal data rights. Chapter 3 traces the historical evolution of trade secret law, highlighting its shift from protecting fair competition to shielding data from consumers and public oversight. Chapter 4 proposes legal and policy reforms to recalibrate trade secret protections when they conflict with privacy rights. It draws lessons from other intellectual property regimes and suggests accountability mechanisms to strengthen data controllers' obligations in responding to access requests. Chapter 5 serves as a “test suite,” evaluating the practical and legal challenges of implementing a meaningful Right of Access to Inferences. Finally, Chapter 6 synthesizes the findings and calls on policymakers to re-examine the boundaries between trade secrecy and privacy law, urging a more transparent, rights-respecting digital ecosystem.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Cultural Identity and Heritage
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.