The Problem of Purpose in Corporate Law

For the last half century, shareholder primacy has reigned as the dominant definition of corporate purpose, as to both the purpose of individual companies and corporate law more generally. Recently, however, the Business Roundtable, the American Law Institute’s Restatement of the Law: Corporate Governance, and many business and legal academics have developed new answers to explain why we have corporations, and the ends to which their massive economic powers should be directed. This Essay endeavors to reframe the focus of the debate beyond purpose itself into the realm of actual governing power. In order to be meaningful, purpose needs governance. While an expansion of corporate purpose to consider the interests of corporate stakeholders would be a positive development, that change will not make a difference unless governance is also restructured to accommodate those stakeholders. We need to undertake the complicated but ultimately rewarding work of restructuring corporate governance if we want to replace shareholder wealth maximization as our orienting economic principle.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Business Law and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Problem of Purpose in Corporate Law

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Business Law and Ethics
article

The Problem of Purpose in Corporate Law

article en

Abstract

For the last half century, shareholder primacy has reigned as the dominant definition of corporate purpose, as to both the purpose of individual companies and corporate law more generally. Recently, however, the Business Roundtable, the American Law Institute’s Restatement of the Law: Corporate Governance, and many business and legal academics have developed new answers to explain why we have corporations, and the ends to which their massive economic powers should be directed. This Essay endeavors to reframe the focus of the debate beyond purpose itself into the realm of actual governing power. In order to be meaningful, purpose needs governance. While an expansion of corporate purpose to consider the interests of corporate stakeholders would be a positive development, that change will not make a difference unless governance is also restructured to accommodate those stakeholders. We need to undertake the complicated but ultimately rewarding work of restructuring corporate governance if we want to replace shareholder wealth maximization as our orienting economic principle.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Business Law and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.