Policy brief - Europe’s strategic dilemma: responding to MENA’s transformations

Regarding the EU's 'strategic dilemma', the tentative conclusion appears to be that there is little dilemma left: the EU has moved from a foreign policy of dialogue in the 1990s, to one called 'principled pragmatism' in 2016, to a policy that appears to be mostly driven by pragmatism and self-interest, particularly in the domains of security, migration and energy. While this new European policy may be required by today's geopolitical developments, it also carries certain risks. First, if the geopolitical merits of human rights and multilateralism (as still proclaimed by the EU) are not sustained in any form, they risk losing their relevance. Second, not adhering to the self- proclaimed European values of international law and humanitarian and democratic principles may be detrimental to the EU's image. Finally, the EU has in the past decade repeatedly been criticized for too little self-reflection on past failed efforts in that region and therefore runs the distinct risk to maintain that attitude when effecting new policies in the region. <div><br></div>

Publication Details

Journal
Leiden Repository (Leiden University)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Government, Law, and Information Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Policy brief - Europe’s strategic dilemma: responding to MENA’s transformations

Leiden Repository (Leiden University)
Government, Law, and Information Management
article

Policy brief - Europe’s strategic dilemma: responding to MENA’s transformations

article en

Abstract

Regarding the EU's 'strategic dilemma', the tentative conclusion appears to be that there is little dilemma left: the EU has moved from a foreign policy of dialogue in the 1990s, to one called 'principled pragmatism' in 2016, to a policy that appears to be mostly driven by pragmatism and self-interest, particularly in the domains of security, migration and energy. While this new European policy may be required by today's geopolitical developments, it also carries certain risks. First, if the geopolitical merits of human rights and multilateralism (as still proclaimed by the EU) are not sustained in any form, they risk losing their relevance. Second, not adhering to the self- proclaimed European values of international law and humanitarian and democratic principles may be detrimental to the EU's image. Finally, the EU has in the past decade repeatedly been criticized for too little self-reflection on past failed efforts in that region and therefore runs the distinct risk to maintain that attitude when effecting new policies in the region. <div><br></div>

Leiden Repository (Leiden University)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Government, Law, and Information Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.