Optimering av Designprocesser : En Kvalitativ Fallstudie av MMI verktyg i Produktutveckling

In product development, early evaluation of user interaction and usability is necessary to ensure that design decisions align with user needs. High-fidelity prototypes enable for realistic simulations of user interaction, despite typically being time- and resource-intensive to construct. This qualitative case study explores the integration of a custom-built Human-Machine Interaction (HMI) tool through semi-structured interviews and observations of user testing. The findings suggest that designers prefer tools that are easy to use yet flexible enough to support creativity. The HMI tool enabled more efficient user testing and reduced reliance on hardware and software engineers, though certain barriers remained. This study identifies five key factors for HMI tools: ease of use, time efficiency, modularity, contextual fit, and collaboration. These results indicate that the success of HMI tools depends not only on technical capabilities, but also how well it fits into the broader context of collaborative and iterative design practice. Collaboration is a critical factor as the tool’s effectiveness is closely tied to the collaborative structures and expertise available. Furthermore, optimizing a design process requires balancing these factors, and aligning them to the prototyping goals for a successful integration of an HMI tool.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimering av Designprocesser : En Kvalitativ Fallstudie av MMI verktyg i Produktutveckling

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
article

Optimering av Designprocesser : En Kvalitativ Fallstudie av MMI verktyg i Produktutveckling

article en

Abstract

In product development, early evaluation of user interaction and usability is necessary to ensure that design decisions align with user needs. High-fidelity prototypes enable for realistic simulations of user interaction, despite typically being time- and resource-intensive to construct. This qualitative case study explores the integration of a custom-built Human-Machine Interaction (HMI) tool through semi-structured interviews and observations of user testing. The findings suggest that designers prefer tools that are easy to use yet flexible enough to support creativity. The HMI tool enabled more efficient user testing and reduced reliance on hardware and software engineers, though certain barriers remained. This study identifies five key factors for HMI tools: ease of use, time efficiency, modularity, contextual fit, and collaboration. These results indicate that the success of HMI tools depends not only on technical capabilities, but also how well it fits into the broader context of collaborative and iterative design practice. Collaboration is a critical factor as the tool’s effectiveness is closely tied to the collaborative structures and expertise available. Furthermore, optimizing a design process requires balancing these factors, and aligning them to the prototyping goals for a successful integration of an HMI tool.

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.