Opinion diversity through hybrid intelligence

This dissertation explores how Large Language Models (LLMs) can effectively and responsibly contribute to complex decision-making processes. By combining AI and human intelligence, Hybrid Intelligence (HI) emerges, allowing the strengths of both humans and machines to be utilized. The work focuses on applying HI in deliberations, a venue where citizens collectively discuss complex societal issues. The goal of these deliberations is not to make decisions but to understand different perspectives and encourage a diversity of opinions. While these gatherings often take place in person, online deliberations offer the opportunity to involve more people and increase diversity. At the same time, this presents a challenge: the vast amount of generated data makes insightful analysis difficult. Although AI can assist with automatic analyses, it struggles to identify viewpoints that are expressed infrequently. When humans and AI work together, on the other hand, we can uncover new insights and better highlight nuances in opinions. This shifts the focus from only obtaining high-level attitudes (for or against) to being able to capture the underlying arguments and values of the opinion holders. In HI, collaboration between citizens and AI is a process that is both transparent and reliable, which supports a democratic debate.<br>

Publication Details

Journal
Leiden Repository (Leiden University)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Nuclear Structure and Function
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Opinion diversity through hybrid intelligence

Leiden Repository (Leiden University)
Nuclear Structure and Function
article

Opinion diversity through hybrid intelligence

article en

Abstract

This dissertation explores how Large Language Models (LLMs) can effectively and responsibly contribute to complex decision-making processes. By combining AI and human intelligence, Hybrid Intelligence (HI) emerges, allowing the strengths of both humans and machines to be utilized. The work focuses on applying HI in deliberations, a venue where citizens collectively discuss complex societal issues. The goal of these deliberations is not to make decisions but to understand different perspectives and encourage a diversity of opinions. While these gatherings often take place in person, online deliberations offer the opportunity to involve more people and increase diversity. At the same time, this presents a challenge: the vast amount of generated data makes insightful analysis difficult. Although AI can assist with automatic analyses, it struggles to identify viewpoints that are expressed infrequently. When humans and AI work together, on the other hand, we can uncover new insights and better highlight nuances in opinions. This shifts the focus from only obtaining high-level attitudes (for or against) to being able to capture the underlying arguments and values of the opinion holders. In HI, collaboration between citizens and AI is a process that is both transparent and reliable, which supports a democratic debate.<br>

Leiden Repository (Leiden University)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Nuclear Structure and Function
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Opinion diversity through hybrid intelligence · Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS