Opportunities and challenges of Artificial Intelligence for the scientific evaluation of social sciences

This article examines the opportunities and challenges presented by artificial intelligence in the scientific evaluation of the social sciences, a field that faces difficulties in quantifying the impact of its output due to the complexity and qualitative nature of its subjects. Unlike the natural sciences, social sciences do not always align well with traditional metrics, such as citations or impact indices. Artificial intelligence, through advanced tools like natural language processing and machine learning, offers alternatives to enhance these evaluation processes. This study follows an exploratory methodology, grounded in a critical literature review and content analysis, aiming to identify the potential of artificial intelligence for measuring academic and social impact within the social sciences. The literature review includes analyses of academic sources and policy documents and is structured around three key areas: improvements in evaluation metrics, innovations in social impact analysis, and proposals for implementation in social sciences. The article concludes that, although artificial intelligence enables more comprehensive evaluations, its application presents ethical challenges, especially regarding algorithmic biases and system transparency. As an original contribution, the article proposes a theoretical model to integrate qualitative and quantitative methods into a more equitable and thorough evaluation adapted to the unique nature of the social sciences. It emphasizes the importance of developing AI tools designed ethically and collaboratively.

Publication Details

Journal
Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Opportunities and challenges of Artificial Intelligence for the scientific evaluation of social sciences

Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
article

Opportunities and challenges of Artificial Intelligence for the scientific evaluation of social sciences

article en

Abstract

This article examines the opportunities and challenges presented by artificial intelligence in the scientific evaluation of the social sciences, a field that faces difficulties in quantifying the impact of its output due to the complexity and qualitative nature of its subjects. Unlike the natural sciences, social sciences do not always align well with traditional metrics, such as citations or impact indices. Artificial intelligence, through advanced tools like natural language processing and machine learning, offers alternatives to enhance these evaluation processes. This study follows an exploratory methodology, grounded in a critical literature review and content analysis, aiming to identify the potential of artificial intelligence for measuring academic and social impact within the social sciences. The literature review includes analyses of academic sources and policy documents and is structured around three key areas: improvements in evaluation metrics, innovations in social impact analysis, and proposals for implementation in social sciences. The article concludes that, although artificial intelligence enables more comprehensive evaluations, its application presents ethical challenges, especially regarding algorithmic biases and system transparency. As an original contribution, the article proposes a theoretical model to integrate qualitative and quantitative methods into a more equitable and thorough evaluation adapted to the unique nature of the social sciences. It emphasizes the importance of developing AI tools designed ethically and collaboratively.

Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.