One Giant Leap for Monopolies: Spectrum, SpaceX, and the FCC's Public Interest Paradox

Repeated like a drumbeat throughout the Communications Act of 1934 (1934 Act) is Congress’s directive that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or the agency) act in the “public interest” when regulating interstate and international communications. Efforts to define this imprecise mandate have fueled nearly a century of legislative, judicial, and regulatory debate. While some contend that the genius behind the standard’s inherent vagueness is its far-reaching flexibility, thus allowing the FCC to evolve alongside the ever-changing telecommunications industry, others criticize the legislation as supplying the FCC with a vast mandate to invoke a broad standard that obscures the agency’s mission and sets it up to fail.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
ICT Impact and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

One Giant Leap for Monopolies: Spectrum, SpaceX, and the FCC's Public Interest Paradox

eYLS (Yale Law School)
ICT Impact and Policies
article

One Giant Leap for Monopolies: Spectrum, SpaceX, and the FCC's Public Interest Paradox

article en

Abstract

Repeated like a drumbeat throughout the Communications Act of 1934 (1934 Act) is Congress’s directive that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or the agency) act in the “public interest” when regulating interstate and international communications. Efforts to define this imprecise mandate have fueled nearly a century of legislative, judicial, and regulatory debate. While some contend that the genius behind the standard’s inherent vagueness is its far-reaching flexibility, thus allowing the FCC to evolve alongside the ever-changing telecommunications industry, others criticize the legislation as supplying the FCC with a vast mandate to invoke a broad standard that obscures the agency’s mission and sets it up to fail.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
ICT Impact and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

One Giant Leap for Monopolies: Spectrum, SpaceX, and the FCC's Public Interest Paradox · eYLS (Yale Law School) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS