No unified Ableukhov: orientalism and imperialism in Andrei Bely's Petersburg.

This project brings into dialogue the 1913 Russian novel Petersburg by Andrei Bely and postcolonial approaches to literature, primarily those developed by Edward Said in Orientalism (1978) and Culture and Imperialism (1994). Petersburg was the product of an artistic movement, Symbolism, that idealized breaking apart boundaries between artforms. Said’s notion of Orientalism, in contrast, is based on the idea that there is an essential division between “East” and “West.” While there might appear to be a tension in applying a theory premised on division to a work that apparently wants to dissolve all boundaries, attention to Petersburg’s depiction of race and empire reveals the extent to which these apparently crucial divisions stand in the way of the Symbolist movement’s idealized unity. By connecting postcolonial literary theory to a novel that has been more widely studied for its artistic and philosophical innovations, I will demonstrate how reading through the lenses of Orientalism and imperialism is crucial to understanding both Petersburg and Russian literature at large.

Publication Details

Journal
ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository (University of Louisville)
Published
2025-05-01
Primary Topic
Mineralogy and Gemology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No unified Ableukhov: orientalism and imperialism in Andrei Bely's Petersburg.

ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository (University of Louisville)
Mineralogy and Gemology Studies
article

No unified Ableukhov: orientalism and imperialism in Andrei Bely's Petersburg.

article en

Abstract

This project brings into dialogue the 1913 Russian novel Petersburg by Andrei Bely and postcolonial approaches to literature, primarily those developed by Edward Said in Orientalism (1978) and Culture and Imperialism (1994). Petersburg was the product of an artistic movement, Symbolism, that idealized breaking apart boundaries between artforms. Said’s notion of Orientalism, in contrast, is based on the idea that there is an essential division between “East” and “West.” While there might appear to be a tension in applying a theory premised on division to a work that apparently wants to dissolve all boundaries, attention to Petersburg’s depiction of race and empire reveals the extent to which these apparently crucial divisions stand in the way of the Symbolist movement’s idealized unity. By connecting postcolonial literary theory to a novel that has been more widely studied for its artistic and philosophical innovations, I will demonstrate how reading through the lenses of Orientalism and imperialism is crucial to understanding both Petersburg and Russian literature at large.

ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository (University of Louisville)
University of Louisville
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Mineralogy and Gemology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

No unified Ableukhov: orientalism and imperialism in Andrei Bely's Petersburg. · ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository (University of Louisville) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS