Navigating Epistemic and Aleatoric Uncertainty in AI-Driven Decisions

In high-stakes domains like healthcare and business, AI-driven decision support systems play a critical role. However, their effectiveness depends on users' ability to navigate the uncertainties inherent in AI predictions. This study explores the cognitive challenges that decision-makers encounter when dealing with two types of uncertainty: epistemic (related to unknowns in the model) and aleatoric (stemming from inherent randomness). By investigating how individuals with different levels of machine learning expertise perceive and manage these uncertainties, the research aims to address a crucial gap in the understanding of human-AI interaction. The insights gained will guide the creation of AI tools that are not only more reliable but also more aligned with the cognitive needs of users, ultimately leading to better decision-making outcomes.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2024-10-23
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating Epistemic and Aleatoric Uncertainty in AI-Driven Decisions

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

Navigating Epistemic and Aleatoric Uncertainty in AI-Driven Decisions

article en

Abstract

In high-stakes domains like healthcare and business, AI-driven decision support systems play a critical role. However, their effectiveness depends on users' ability to navigate the uncertainties inherent in AI predictions. This study explores the cognitive challenges that decision-makers encounter when dealing with two types of uncertainty: epistemic (related to unknowns in the model) and aleatoric (stemming from inherent randomness). By investigating how individuals with different levels of machine learning expertise perceive and manage these uncertainties, the research aims to address a crucial gap in the understanding of human-AI interaction. The insights gained will guide the creation of AI tools that are not only more reliable but also more aligned with the cognitive needs of users, ultimately leading to better decision-making outcomes.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.