Life for Rent: Evolving Residential Infrastructure in London and the Rise of Built-to-Rent

Build-to-Rent (BTR) developments have expanded rapidly in the UK since 2013, often advertised as providing better quality rented accommodation for university-educated Millennials than available elsewhere in the Private Rental Sector. However, the implications of this type of housing development, and especially its affordability, are poorly understood at a city-scale, partly due to a lack of evidence of where these developments cluster and what they add to the housing stock in terms of property type, amenities, and cost. This paper draws on data relating to 373 BTR developments in London (representing over 40,000 housing units) to show that developments are clustered where transport-related infrastructural investments have opened 'rent gaps' that can be exploited by developers. Exploring how these BTR schemes are marketed, the paper shows this accommodation is typically provided through a new short-term ‘subscription service’ which allows developers to rent property at a premium. Questioning whether BTRs really add affordable ‘local’ homes to the city, the paper concludes BTR provide ‘quick-fix’ rental accommodation which is doing little to solve London’s ‘housing crisis’. We focus on the London BTR market and how the expansion of this housing type is reshaping the sociospatial geographies of the city.

Publication Details

Journal
UCL Discovery (University College London)
Published
2025-05-01
Primary Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Life for Rent: Evolving Residential Infrastructure in London and the Rise of Built-to-Rent

UCL Discovery (University College London)
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
article

Life for Rent: Evolving Residential Infrastructure in London and the Rise of Built-to-Rent

article en

Abstract

Build-to-Rent (BTR) developments have expanded rapidly in the UK since 2013, often advertised as providing better quality rented accommodation for university-educated Millennials than available elsewhere in the Private Rental Sector. However, the implications of this type of housing development, and especially its affordability, are poorly understood at a city-scale, partly due to a lack of evidence of where these developments cluster and what they add to the housing stock in terms of property type, amenities, and cost. This paper draws on data relating to 373 BTR developments in London (representing over 40,000 housing units) to show that developments are clustered where transport-related infrastructural investments have opened 'rent gaps' that can be exploited by developers. Exploring how these BTR schemes are marketed, the paper shows this accommodation is typically provided through a new short-term ‘subscription service’ which allows developers to rent property at a premium. Questioning whether BTRs really add affordable ‘local’ homes to the city, the paper concludes BTR provide ‘quick-fix’ rental accommodation which is doing little to solve London’s ‘housing crisis’. We focus on the London BTR market and how the expansion of this housing type is reshaping the sociospatial geographies of the city.

UCL Discovery (University College London)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.