The impact of hawkish biases on group decision-making processes

The presence of hawkish biases, defined by a strong inclination towards confrontational and forceful techniques, significantly impacts the complexities of collective decision-making. The main objective of this study is to thoroughly analyze the influence of Hawkish biases on the mechanisms of collective decision-making. This research aims to determine the precise processes by which these biases influence group dynamics and eventually impact decision resultsThe technique involves a comprehensive analysis of existing literature, including empirical studies and theoretical frameworks, to examine Hawkish biases in collective decision-making. The findings suggest that adopting an aggressive approach often leads to unfavorable decision outcomes, including overreliance on inaccurate or insufficient information, preference for aggressive methods, and increased likelihood of internal discord and division within organizations. Furthermore, the research highlights several crucial aspects contributing to the durability of Hawkish biases throughout the decision-making process.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of hawkish biases on group decision-making processes

Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

The impact of hawkish biases on group decision-making processes

article en

Abstract

The presence of hawkish biases, defined by a strong inclination towards confrontational and forceful techniques, significantly impacts the complexities of collective decision-making. The main objective of this study is to thoroughly analyze the influence of Hawkish biases on the mechanisms of collective decision-making. This research aims to determine the precise processes by which these biases influence group dynamics and eventually impact decision resultsThe technique involves a comprehensive analysis of existing literature, including empirical studies and theoretical frameworks, to examine Hawkish biases in collective decision-making. The findings suggest that adopting an aggressive approach often leads to unfavorable decision outcomes, including overreliance on inaccurate or insufficient information, preference for aggressive methods, and increased likelihood of internal discord and division within organizations. Furthermore, the research highlights several crucial aspects contributing to the durability of Hawkish biases throughout the decision-making process.

Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
State Space Agency of Ukraine (UA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The impact of hawkish biases on group decision-making processes · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS