First-Person Pronoun Use in Sociology and Natural Resources and Environment (NRE) Student Essays : A Corpus-Based Analysis of Disciplinary Differences

This study aims to explore how graduate student writers in Sociology and Natural Resources and Environment (NRE) use first-person pronouns to construct writer identity in academic texts. Drawing on Tang and John’s (1999) six-role typology, the analysis focuses on sixteen A-graded essays from the Michigan Corpus of Upper-Level Student Papers (MICUSP). The findings demonstrate that pronoun use varies across disciplines, reflecting differing rhetorical norms and expectations. There also appear to be differences based on the two genres included in the analysis, which are argumentative essays and research papers. Compared to earlier studies on undergraduate writing, this research reveals a broader and more confident deployment of authorial roles, highlighting the influence of academic level, genre, and disciplinary context. The study offers insights for writing pedagogy and contributes to a deeper understanding of identity construction in student academic writing.

Publication Details

Journal
Dalarna University College Electronic Archive
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

First-Person Pronoun Use in Sociology and Natural Resources and Environment (NRE) Student Essays : A Corpus-Based Analysis of Disciplinary Differences

Dalarna University College Electronic Archive
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
article

First-Person Pronoun Use in Sociology and Natural Resources and Environment (NRE) Student Essays : A Corpus-Based Analysis of Disciplinary Differences

article en

Abstract

This study aims to explore how graduate student writers in Sociology and Natural Resources and Environment (NRE) use first-person pronouns to construct writer identity in academic texts. Drawing on Tang and John’s (1999) six-role typology, the analysis focuses on sixteen A-graded essays from the Michigan Corpus of Upper-Level Student Papers (MICUSP). The findings demonstrate that pronoun use varies across disciplines, reflecting differing rhetorical norms and expectations. There also appear to be differences based on the two genres included in the analysis, which are argumentative essays and research papers. Compared to earlier studies on undergraduate writing, this research reveals a broader and more confident deployment of authorial roles, highlighting the influence of academic level, genre, and disciplinary context. The study offers insights for writing pedagogy and contributes to a deeper understanding of identity construction in student academic writing.

Dalarna University College Electronic Archive
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.