The Epistemic Insignificance of Doxastic Wronging

We sometimes wrong others through our actions. Can we also wrong others in thought? If it is possible to wrong others in thought, what impact does such wronging have on the norms governing belief formation and revision? For example, is it permissible (or perhaps even required) for us to withhold forming a belief about a person if that belief would wrong them?

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Epistemic Insignificance of Doxastic Wronging

Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

The Epistemic Insignificance of Doxastic Wronging

article en

Abstract

We sometimes wrong others through our actions. Can we also wrong others in thought? If it is possible to wrong others in thought, what impact does such wronging have on the norms governing belief formation and revision? For example, is it permissible (or perhaps even required) for us to withhold forming a belief about a person if that belief would wrong them?

Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
OpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Epistemic Insignificance of Doxastic Wronging · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS