Evaluation Checklist for the Multidisciplinary Approach to Patients with Asthma or Suspected Asthma in United Airway Disease

Carlos Almonacid,1 Pilar Ausín,2 José Miguel Villacampa,3 Ignacio Dávila,4 Mayte Pinilla,5 Javier Dominguez-Ortega6 1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain; 2Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; 3Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain; 4Department of Allergology, Hospital Universitario Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain; 5Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain; 6Department of Allergology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, SpainCorrespondence: Pilar Ausín, Department of Respiratory Medicine Hospital del Mar, Pg. Marítim de la Barceloneta, 25, 29, Barcelona, 08003, Spain, Tel +34 932 48 30 00, Email [email protected]: To generate an evaluation checklist for the multidisciplinary approach to patients with asthma or suspected asthma.Patients and Methods: This was a qualitative study based on a literature review and expert opinions. A multidisciplinary steering committee with knowledge and experience in asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) was established and comprised two pneumologists, two allergologists, and two otorhinolaryngologists. They designed a preliminary evaluation checklist based on the best evidence available and their experience. An extra panel of 21 experts (five pneumologists, five allergologists, and 11 otorhinolaryngologists) analyzed and discussed the checklist, leading to the final version.Results: The checklist for the multidisciplinary approach to patients with asthma or suspected asthma includes the first and the follow-up visits. It is organized into several sections covering 1) current asthma and past history (diagnosis, symptoms, severity, control, etc.); 2) comorbidities (CRSwNP, atopic dermatitis, etc.); 3) physical examination and diagnostic tests (spirometry, bronchodilator reversibility test, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, etc.); 4) complementary tests (imaging, laboratory, allergy tests, etc.); 5) red flags (near-fatal asthma, CRSwNP complications); and 6) biological treatment (indication, response to treatment, decision making, etc.). Each section is divided into sub-sections detailing the recommended evaluation items. These items contain explanations, definitions, or variable lists that can be measured using direct questions, validated questionnaires, or other procedures such as imaging techniques or biomarkers. The checklist also proposes clinical actions.Conclusion: This evaluation checklist might help improve and standardize the clinical management of patients with asthma or suspected asthma.Keywords: Asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, united airways disease, type 2 inflammation clinical consultation, multidisciplinary care, checklist