From exploration to intervention: Enhancing medication communication at hospital discharge

Background: Older hospitalised patients are particularly prone to drug-related problems (DRPs) following hospital discharge, often due to ineffective medication communication and limited patient involvement. This thesis aimed to explore the discharge medication communication process for older patients and apply these insights to improve it. Methods: A process evaluation of a clinical trial assessed how hospital-based medication reviews and discharge-related communication components were carried out by clinical pharmacists. A retrospective chart review evaluated the adequacy of medication-related referrals (MRRs) at discharge and their association with unplanned hospital revisits. Qualitative studies involving focus groups, interviews, and observations explored the perspectives of healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients regarding discharge communication. These findings, combined with public co-production, informed the development of an intervention, alongside a study protocol. Results: Intervention fidelity in the clinical trial was high for admission-related components, with clinical pharmacists resolving DRPs and medication discrepancies in three out of four patients. However, discharge-related fidelity was lower: medication reconciliations were completed for half of the patients, and MRRs were sent at similar rates in both intervention and control groups. MRRs were found to be inadequate in a substantial proportion of patients (40 %), with one in twenty cases potentially contributing to an unplanned hospital revisit. HCPs perceived discharge communication as complex and fragmented, hindered by systemic and organisational barriers. Patients experienced it as a one-way transfer of information from HCPs to patients, primarily structured around HCPs' priorities rather than their own needs. In response, a multifaceted intervention was developed, incorporating a structured and integrated role for clinical pharmacists in the discharge process. The intervention included components to enhance the quality of medication-related discharge documents, empower patients through an information package, strengthen informal caregiver involvement, and provide follow-up calls after discharge. A pre-post study design was established to evaluate the intervention’s effects on medication communication and patient outcomes compared to usual care. Conclusions: Medication communication at hospital discharge remains a critical challenge, characterised by information gaps between HCPs and insufficient focus on equipping patients with the prerequisites to resume self-care after returning home. A multifaceted intervention study was developed to address these challenges.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From exploration to intervention: Enhancing medication communication at hospital discharge

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
article

From exploration to intervention: Enhancing medication communication at hospital discharge

article en

Abstract

Background: Older hospitalised patients are particularly prone to drug-related problems (DRPs) following hospital discharge, often due to ineffective medication communication and limited patient involvement. This thesis aimed to explore the discharge medication communication process for older patients and apply these insights to improve it. Methods: A process evaluation of a clinical trial assessed how hospital-based medication reviews and discharge-related communication components were carried out by clinical pharmacists. A retrospective chart review evaluated the adequacy of medication-related referrals (MRRs) at discharge and their association with unplanned hospital revisits. Qualitative studies involving focus groups, interviews, and observations explored the perspectives of healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients regarding discharge communication. These findings, combined with public co-production, informed the development of an intervention, alongside a study protocol. Results: Intervention fidelity in the clinical trial was high for admission-related components, with clinical pharmacists resolving DRPs and medication discrepancies in three out of four patients. However, discharge-related fidelity was lower: medication reconciliations were completed for half of the patients, and MRRs were sent at similar rates in both intervention and control groups. MRRs were found to be inadequate in a substantial proportion of patients (40 %), with one in twenty cases potentially contributing to an unplanned hospital revisit. HCPs perceived discharge communication as complex and fragmented, hindered by systemic and organisational barriers. Patients experienced it as a one-way transfer of information from HCPs to patients, primarily structured around HCPs' priorities rather than their own needs. In response, a multifaceted intervention was developed, incorporating a structured and integrated role for clinical pharmacists in the discharge process. The intervention included components to enhance the quality of medication-related discharge documents, empower patients through an information package, strengthen informal caregiver involvement, and provide follow-up calls after discharge. A pre-post study design was established to evaluate the intervention’s effects on medication communication and patient outcomes compared to usual care. Conclusions: Medication communication at hospital discharge remains a critical challenge, characterised by information gaps between HCPs and insufficient focus on equipping patients with the prerequisites to resume self-care after returning home. A multifaceted intervention study was developed to address these challenges.

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Uppsala University (SE), University of Bradford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.