A Feminist Evaluation of the Joint Programme: Assessing the Cultural Sensitivity of UNICEF and UNFPA's Strategies on Female Genital Cutting/Circumcision in Senegal and Nigeria

Female Genital Cutting/Circumcision (FGC) encompasses procedures involving the partial or total removal of female external genitalia or other genital injuries, performed for non-medical reasons. Typically carried out on young girls, often between infancy and age 15, FGC is widely condemned in global discourse as a harmful and barbaric practice. However, within certain cultures, it is viewed as a rite of passage or a necessary tradition. I argue that to effectively address FGC, organizations must adopt a culturally sensitive approach. This research examines the United Nations Children’s Fund’s (UNICEF) and the United Nations Population Fund’s (UNFPA) initiatives in Senegal and Nigeria. The research questions I address are, which intervention type do these initiatives fall under: system, service, or community-level? Do these interventions centralize the voices and perspectives of girls and women who have experienced FGC? Are these interventions culturally sensitive? By analyzing current approaches we can gain valuable insights into how to enhance future interventions and adopt more culturally sensitive methods to combat FGC.

Publication Details

Journal
Cornerstone (Minnesota State University, Mankato)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Feminist Evaluation of the Joint Programme: Assessing the Cultural Sensitivity of UNICEF and UNFPA's Strategies on Female Genital Cutting/Circumcision in Senegal and Nigeria

Cornerstone (Minnesota State University, Mankato)
Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
article

A Feminist Evaluation of the Joint Programme: Assessing the Cultural Sensitivity of UNICEF and UNFPA's Strategies on Female Genital Cutting/Circumcision in Senegal and Nigeria

article en

Abstract

Female Genital Cutting/Circumcision (FGC) encompasses procedures involving the partial or total removal of female external genitalia or other genital injuries, performed for non-medical reasons. Typically carried out on young girls, often between infancy and age 15, FGC is widely condemned in global discourse as a harmful and barbaric practice. However, within certain cultures, it is viewed as a rite of passage or a necessary tradition. I argue that to effectively address FGC, organizations must adopt a culturally sensitive approach. This research examines the United Nations Children’s Fund’s (UNICEF) and the United Nations Population Fund’s (UNFPA) initiatives in Senegal and Nigeria. The research questions I address are, which intervention type do these initiatives fall under: system, service, or community-level? Do these interventions centralize the voices and perspectives of girls and women who have experienced FGC? Are these interventions culturally sensitive? By analyzing current approaches we can gain valuable insights into how to enhance future interventions and adopt more culturally sensitive methods to combat FGC.

Cornerstone (Minnesota State University, Mankato)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.