Fracture Strength of Monolithic Endocrowns and Advanced Lithium Disilicate - A Pilot Study

Introduction Root-filled teeth with large losses of tooth substance is a challenge for dental clinicians. The restoration of choice has traditionally been post and core buildup with a crown. Monolithic endocrowns in lithium disilicate, have been suggested as an alternative to this traditional restoration. Monolithic restorations offer possibilities which could provide treatment alternatives with a more reliable prognosis. Aim The aim is to examine the fracture strength of endocrowns made of advanced lithium disilicate. Material and method Twelve root-filled molars were restored with advanced lithium disilicate (Tessera) or lithium disilicate (e.max CAD) but with two different designs: endocrown and post and core + crown. The control groups consisted of post and core and e.max CAD. The samples were thermocycled and loaded in a chewing simulator (100.000 cycles, 5-55 Celsius (oC)) simultaneously, and finally loaded until fracture. The data was analysed with One-Way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey’s test. Fracture patterns were visually divided in two groups and analysed using Chi2-test (significance level α = 0.05). Results E. max CAD in both groups of restorations showed higher fracture strength compared to Tessera. A statistical difference was noted when comparing the ECE group to the ECT (p value = 0.016) as well as the PCT group (p value = 0.009). The number of endocrown samples, regardless of material, that totalfractured was equal to the number of endocrown samples that crownfractured. Among the post and core crown samples regardless of material, there were three that crownfractured and two that totalfractured. However, there was one dropout in the post and core crown groups (PCE). No statistical difference was shown between the groups regarding the fracture modes.Conclusion The results from this study are highly unreliable due to the small sample size and no definitive conclusion can be drawn. However, the results may represent a trend indicating a higher fracture strength for the endocrowns made of lithium disilicate.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Design Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fracture Strength of Monolithic Endocrowns and Advanced Lithium Disilicate - A Pilot Study

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Design Education and Practice
article

Fracture Strength of Monolithic Endocrowns and Advanced Lithium Disilicate - A Pilot Study

article en

Abstract

Introduction Root-filled teeth with large losses of tooth substance is a challenge for dental clinicians. The restoration of choice has traditionally been post and core buildup with a crown. Monolithic endocrowns in lithium disilicate, have been suggested as an alternative to this traditional restoration. Monolithic restorations offer possibilities which could provide treatment alternatives with a more reliable prognosis. Aim The aim is to examine the fracture strength of endocrowns made of advanced lithium disilicate. Material and method Twelve root-filled molars were restored with advanced lithium disilicate (Tessera) or lithium disilicate (e.max CAD) but with two different designs: endocrown and post and core + crown. The control groups consisted of post and core and e.max CAD. The samples were thermocycled and loaded in a chewing simulator (100.000 cycles, 5-55 Celsius (oC)) simultaneously, and finally loaded until fracture. The data was analysed with One-Way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey’s test. Fracture patterns were visually divided in two groups and analysed using Chi2-test (significance level α = 0.05). Results E. max CAD in both groups of restorations showed higher fracture strength compared to Tessera. A statistical difference was noted when comparing the ECE group to the ECT (p value = 0.016) as well as the PCT group (p value = 0.009). The number of endocrown samples, regardless of material, that totalfractured was equal to the number of endocrown samples that crownfractured. Among the post and core crown samples regardless of material, there were three that crownfractured and two that totalfractured. However, there was one dropout in the post and core crown groups (PCE). No statistical difference was shown between the groups regarding the fracture modes.Conclusion The results from this study are highly unreliable due to the small sample size and no definitive conclusion can be drawn. However, the results may represent a trend indicating a higher fracture strength for the endocrowns made of lithium disilicate.

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Malmö University (SE)
Dentsply Sirona
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Design Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.