Empathy and the Equality Act 2010 in cases on religion or belief

This paper explores recent judicial approaches in cases under the Equality Act 2010 involving the manifestation by employees of protected beliefs, including gender critical beliefs. The paper argues that empathy, understood as perspective-taking, ought to guide decision-makers in the adjudication of cases involving manifestations of religion or belief and competing equality interests. It further argues that whilst recent judicial interpretations of direct discrimination in religion or belief cases disrupt traditional understandings of direct discrimination, they provide the opportunity to engage in an empathic approach to decision-making which is jurisprudentially sound. Despite this potential, the paper identifies concerns in relation to the practical application of this new trend in the jurisprudence and contends that some of these concerns could effectively be addressed by legislative intervention which would encourage the development of clear jurisprudence to aid litigants and the development of social norms for guiding behaviours in this contested field.

Publication Details

Journal
ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Empathy and the Equality Act 2010 in cases on religion or belief

ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

Empathy and the Equality Act 2010 in cases on religion or belief

article en

Abstract

This paper explores recent judicial approaches in cases under the Equality Act 2010 involving the manifestation by employees of protected beliefs, including gender critical beliefs. The paper argues that empathy, understood as perspective-taking, ought to guide decision-makers in the adjudication of cases involving manifestations of religion or belief and competing equality interests. It further argues that whilst recent judicial interpretations of direct discrimination in religion or belief cases disrupt traditional understandings of direct discrimination, they provide the opportunity to engage in an empathic approach to decision-making which is jurisprudentially sound. Despite this potential, the paper identifies concerns in relation to the practical application of this new trend in the jurisprudence and contends that some of these concerns could effectively be addressed by legislative intervention which would encourage the development of clear jurisprudence to aid litigants and the development of social norms for guiding behaviours in this contested field.

ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.