Enhancing Cloud Security Assessment Frameworks for the Generative AI Era: An Action Design Research Approach

This study addresses how cloud security assessment frameworks can evolve to counter risks introduced by Generative AI (GAI) in software development. Using Action Design Research, we identify gaps between the Cloud Security Alliance's Consensus Assessments Initiative Questionnaire (CAIQ) and NIST's Secure Software Development Framework (SSDF), focusing on AI-specific security considerations. We developed enhanced assessment questions addressing both traditional and AI-specific vulnerabilities, then evaluated their effectiveness by analyzing cybersecurity disclosures in 50 cloud vendors' 10-K filings using GPT-4o. Results reveal that while organizations implement traditional security measures, AI-specific practices—including model governance, adversarial testing, and incident response—remain underdeveloped. We contribute theoretical insights into evolving security frameworks and practical recommendations for strengthening cybersecurity in AI-driven cloud environments.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2025-08-15
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Cloud Security Assessment Frameworks for the Generative AI Era: An Action Design Research Approach

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

Enhancing Cloud Security Assessment Frameworks for the Generative AI Era: An Action Design Research Approach

article en

Abstract

This study addresses how cloud security assessment frameworks can evolve to counter risks introduced by Generative AI (GAI) in software development. Using Action Design Research, we identify gaps between the Cloud Security Alliance's Consensus Assessments Initiative Questionnaire (CAIQ) and NIST's Secure Software Development Framework (SSDF), focusing on AI-specific security considerations. We developed enhanced assessment questions addressing both traditional and AI-specific vulnerabilities, then evaluated their effectiveness by analyzing cybersecurity disclosures in 50 cloud vendors' 10-K filings using GPT-4o. Results reveal that while organizations implement traditional security measures, AI-specific practices—including model governance, adversarial testing, and incident response—remain underdeveloped. We contribute theoretical insights into evolving security frameworks and practical recommendations for strengthening cybersecurity in AI-driven cloud environments.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Enhancing Cloud Security Assessment Frameworks for the Generative AI Era: An Action Design Research Approach · Journal of the Association for Information Systems (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS