Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training on Collegiate-Level Soccer Athletes

Blood flow restriction (BFR) exercise involves the occlusion of blood vessels in targeted areas of the body that could lead to muscle hypertrophy and bone growth. Blood flow restriction resistance exercise training elicits hypertrophy to a similar extent as traditional resistance exercise but with a lower load and may increase bone mineral density (BMD) and lean mass. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of BFR training on body composition and bone mineral density in collegiate-level soccer athletes to other training modalities. METHODS: 24 collegiate soccer players with an average age of 20.66 ± 1.38 years were analyzed in the study. There were 7 soccer players (3 male, 4 female) who underwent the BFR training, 3 female athletes who completed hypertrophy training, and 14 athletes (4 male, 10 female) who did a strength/power resistance training program. Anthropometric data was obtained via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) on the athletes before and after the 4-month off-season training period to evaluate changes in BMD and lean mass. Paired t-tests were used to compare pre- and post-training data. RESULTS: All athletes (n=24) had an increase in fat mass and lean mass across all training groups. Although not significant, the hypertrophy group had the largest gains in whole body BMD (0.70% ± 4.25%), followed by the BFR group (0.52% ± 6.06%), with the strength/power group having the lowest gains (0.26 ± 4.55%). BFR had the greatest increase in lean mass (4.04% ± 10.24%), followed by strength/power (3.60% ± 10.24%), and lastly the hypertrophy group (3.24% ± 10.24%). CONCLUSION: In a small sample size of collegiate soccer players, BFR had similar effects on lean mass and BMD as traditional resistance exercise. These data support the idea of incorporating BFR training to elicit similar improvements in lean mass and BMD without high load and strain of traditional resistance exercise. More data is necessary to assess if incorporating BFR into in-season training can elicit similar improvements in performance while minimizing overall training strain.

Publication Details

Journal
TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University)
Published
2024-11-06
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training on Collegiate-Level Soccer Athletes

TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University)
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training on Collegiate-Level Soccer Athletes

article en

Abstract

Blood flow restriction (BFR) exercise involves the occlusion of blood vessels in targeted areas of the body that could lead to muscle hypertrophy and bone growth. Blood flow restriction resistance exercise training elicits hypertrophy to a similar extent as traditional resistance exercise but with a lower load and may increase bone mineral density (BMD) and lean mass. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of BFR training on body composition and bone mineral density in collegiate-level soccer athletes to other training modalities. METHODS: 24 collegiate soccer players with an average age of 20.66 ± 1.38 years were analyzed in the study. There were 7 soccer players (3 male, 4 female) who underwent the BFR training, 3 female athletes who completed hypertrophy training, and 14 athletes (4 male, 10 female) who did a strength/power resistance training program. Anthropometric data was obtained via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) on the athletes before and after the 4-month off-season training period to evaluate changes in BMD and lean mass. Paired t-tests were used to compare pre- and post-training data. RESULTS: All athletes (n=24) had an increase in fat mass and lean mass across all training groups. Although not significant, the hypertrophy group had the largest gains in whole body BMD (0.70% ± 4.25%), followed by the BFR group (0.52% ± 6.06%), with the strength/power group having the lowest gains (0.26 ± 4.55%). BFR had the greatest increase in lean mass (4.04% ± 10.24%), followed by strength/power (3.60% ± 10.24%), and lastly the hypertrophy group (3.24% ± 10.24%). CONCLUSION: In a small sample size of collegiate soccer players, BFR had similar effects on lean mass and BMD as traditional resistance exercise. These data support the idea of incorporating BFR training to elicit similar improvements in lean mass and BMD without high load and strain of traditional resistance exercise. More data is necessary to assess if incorporating BFR into in-season training can elicit similar improvements in performance while minimizing overall training strain.

TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.