Different strategies for landing from different heights among people with chronic ankle instability

<p><strong>Background</strong></p>\n<p>Lateral ankle sprain (LAS) usually occurs during landing from heights among people with chronic ankle instability (CAI). Although the kinematics when landing on the flat surface has been reported, no studies have explored the effect of different heights on the landing strategies using a trapdoor device among people with CAI.</p>\n<p><strong>Research question</strong></p>\n<p>Do people with CAI adopt different landing strategies when drop-landing on the trapdoor device from three heights?</p>\n<p><strong>Methods</strong></p>\n<p>Thirty-one participants with CAI (24 males and 7 females, age=21.1±1.8 years, height=176.9±7.4 cm, body mass=71.9±9.2 kg, injured side=18 R&13 L) were recruited. They dropped from three different heights (low height (16 cm), medium height (23 cm), high height (30 cm)) with their affected foot landing on a movable surface of a trapdoor device, which was tilted 24° inward and 15° forward to simulate LAS. Kinematic data was collected using a twelve-camera motion capture system. One-way analysis of variance with repeated measures was used to compare the differences between the three heights.</p>\n<p><strong>Results</strong></p>\n<p>Significant height effects were detected in the peak ankle inversion angle (p=0.009, η2p=0.280) and angular velocity (p<0.001, η2p=0.444), and the peak ankle plantarflexion (p=0.002, η2p=0.360), knee flexion (p<0.001, η2p=0.555), and hip flexion (p=0.030, η2p=0.215) angles at the time of peak ankle inversion. Post-hoc tests showed that all the angles and velocities were higher at a low height than at medium (p: 0.001–0.045, <em>d</em>: 0.14–0.44) and high heights (p: 0.001–0.023, <em>d</em>: 0.28–0.66), except for the ankle plantarflexion angle, which was lower at a low height than at medium (p<0.001, <em>d</em>=0.44) and high (p=0.021, <em>d</em>=0.38) heights.</p>\n<p><strong>Significance</strong></p>\n<p>People with CAI adopt a protective strategy during drop-landing at medium and high heights compared to a low height. This strategy involves increased ankle dorsiflexion angle as well as knee and hip flexion angles. </p>

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-09-15
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Different strategies for landing from different heights among people with chronic ankle instability

Figshare
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

Different strategies for landing from different heights among people with chronic ankle instability

article en

Abstract

<p><strong>Background</strong></p>\n<p>Lateral ankle sprain (LAS) usually occurs during landing from heights among people with chronic ankle instability (CAI). Although the kinematics when landing on the flat surface has been reported, no studies have explored the effect of different heights on the landing strategies using a trapdoor device among people with CAI.</p>\n<p><strong>Research question</strong></p>\n<p>Do people with CAI adopt different landing strategies when drop-landing on the trapdoor device from three heights?</p>\n<p><strong>Methods</strong></p>\n<p>Thirty-one participants with CAI (24 males and 7 females, age=21.1±1.8 years, height=176.9±7.4 cm, body mass=71.9±9.2 kg, injured side=18 R&13 L) were recruited. They dropped from three different heights (low height (16 cm), medium height (23 cm), high height (30 cm)) with their affected foot landing on a movable surface of a trapdoor device, which was tilted 24° inward and 15° forward to simulate LAS. Kinematic data was collected using a twelve-camera motion capture system. One-way analysis of variance with repeated measures was used to compare the differences between the three heights.</p>\n<p><strong>Results</strong></p>\n<p>Significant height effects were detected in the peak ankle inversion angle (p=0.009, η2p=0.280) and angular velocity (p<0.001, η2p=0.444), and the peak ankle plantarflexion (p=0.002, η2p=0.360), knee flexion (p<0.001, η2p=0.555), and hip flexion (p=0.030, η2p=0.215) angles at the time of peak ankle inversion. Post-hoc tests showed that all the angles and velocities were higher at a low height than at medium (p: 0.001–0.045, <em>d</em>: 0.14–0.44) and high heights (p: 0.001–0.023, <em>d</em>: 0.28–0.66), except for the ankle plantarflexion angle, which was lower at a low height than at medium (p<0.001, <em>d</em>=0.44) and high (p=0.021, <em>d</em>=0.38) heights.</p>\n<p><strong>Significance</strong></p>\n<p>People with CAI adopt a protective strategy during drop-landing at medium and high heights compared to a low height. This strategy involves increased ankle dorsiflexion angle as well as knee and hip flexion angles. </p>

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Different strategies for landing from different heights among people with chronic ankle instability · Figshare (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS