The Delaware Bankruptcy Court's Approach to the Subjective Prong of the Ordinary Course of Business Defense

(Excerpt) The ordinary course of business defense (the "OCB Defense") to preference claims under section 547(c)(2)(A) of title 11 of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code") protects transfers that are consistent with previous transactions between a debtor and creditor. In evaluating this defense, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the "Delaware Bankruptcy Court") conducts a fact-intensive inquiry into whether the challenged transfers were consistent with the parties’ previously established business practices. Key considerations include the length and regularity of the relationship, the timing and method of the transactions, and the absence of aggressive collection tactics or efforts to exploit the debtor’s financial decline. If the defendant can show that the transactions in question were sufficiently consistent with prior dealings, section 547(c) will shield the transfers from avoidance

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Delaware Bankruptcy Court's Approach to the Subjective Prong of the Ordinary Course of Business Defense

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

The Delaware Bankruptcy Court's Approach to the Subjective Prong of the Ordinary Course of Business Defense

article en

Abstract

(Excerpt) The ordinary course of business defense (the "OCB Defense") to preference claims under section 547(c)(2)(A) of title 11 of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code") protects transfers that are consistent with previous transactions between a debtor and creditor. In evaluating this defense, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the "Delaware Bankruptcy Court") conducts a fact-intensive inquiry into whether the challenged transfers were consistent with the parties’ previously established business practices. Key considerations include the length and regularity of the relationship, the timing and method of the transactions, and the absence of aggressive collection tactics or efforts to exploit the debtor’s financial decline. If the defendant can show that the transactions in question were sufficiently consistent with prior dealings, section 547(c) will shield the transfers from avoidance

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.