Comparing Ultrasound, Chest X-Ray, and CT Scan for Pneumonia Detection

Ziyad F Al Nufaiei,1,2 Khalid M Alshamrani2,3 1Respiratory Therapy Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; 2King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; 3Radiological Sciences Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi ArabiaCorrespondence: Ziyad F Al Nufaiei, Department of Respiratory Therapy, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, Email [email protected]: The clinical methods of diagnosing pneumonia have been for many years chest X-rays (CXR) and computed tomography (CT) scans. However, a relatively new modality that is promising, efficient, and cheap is the lung ultrasound (LUS). The scope of this systematic review focuses on evaluating the diagnostic performance of LUS, CXR, and CT for diagnosing pneumonia.Objective: The first aim of this review is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound in comparison with chest X-rays and CT scans.Methods: PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Scopus were electronically searched without date and language limitations were set. Inclusion criteria covered only those diagnostic studies that involved comparing lung ultrasound, chest X-ray, and CT scans in human beings with suspected pneumonia. Both abstraction and quality of studies were assessed by two researchers and the quality was assessed using PRISMA and QUADAS-2 checklists.Results: There were 13 empirical studies included in the review which referred to different patients and contexts. Although none of the imaging techniques could achieve both high sensitivity and high specificity, CT scans produced the highest sensitivity, with values higher than 95% on all occasions, and specificities ranging between 80% and 90%. Lung US was most helpful in pediatric and acute care populations, whereas CT was preferred when there was uncertainty regarding the presentation.Conclusion: Lung ultrasound is a very sensitive, specific, practical method of subsequent lung examination; it is useful in environments that need fast bedside assessment and for patients particularly vulnerable to radiation exposure, such as children. Even though chest X-ray remains valuable in excluding pneumonia in outpatient practices, it lacks sensitivity and is therefore less useful in diagnosing early disease. Computed tomography scans are the most accurate type of scans but should only be used in the more severe interventions due to cost and radiation exposure.Keywords: CT scan, chest X-ray, ultrasound, pneumonia, critical care

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-03-01
Primary Topic
Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Ultrasound, Chest X-Ray, and CT Scan for Pneumonia Detection

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
article

Comparing Ultrasound, Chest X-Ray, and CT Scan for Pneumonia Detection

article en

Abstract

Ziyad F Al Nufaiei,1,2 Khalid M Alshamrani2,3 1Respiratory Therapy Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; 2King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; 3Radiological Sciences Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi ArabiaCorrespondence: Ziyad F Al Nufaiei, Department of Respiratory Therapy, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, Email [email protected]: The clinical methods of diagnosing pneumonia have been for many years chest X-rays (CXR) and computed tomography (CT) scans. However, a relatively new modality that is promising, efficient, and cheap is the lung ultrasound (LUS). The scope of this systematic review focuses on evaluating the diagnostic performance of LUS, CXR, and CT for diagnosing pneumonia.Objective: The first aim of this review is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound in comparison with chest X-rays and CT scans.Methods: PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Scopus were electronically searched without date and language limitations were set. Inclusion criteria covered only those diagnostic studies that involved comparing lung ultrasound, chest X-ray, and CT scans in human beings with suspected pneumonia. Both abstraction and quality of studies were assessed by two researchers and the quality was assessed using PRISMA and QUADAS-2 checklists.Results: There were 13 empirical studies included in the review which referred to different patients and contexts. Although none of the imaging techniques could achieve both high sensitivity and high specificity, CT scans produced the highest sensitivity, with values higher than 95% on all occasions, and specificities ranging between 80% and 90%. Lung US was most helpful in pediatric and acute care populations, whereas CT was preferred when there was uncertainty regarding the presentation.Conclusion: Lung ultrasound is a very sensitive, specific, practical method of subsequent lung examination; it is useful in environments that need fast bedside assessment and for patients particularly vulnerable to radiation exposure, such as children. Even though chest X-ray remains valuable in excluding pneumonia in outpatient practices, it lacks sensitivity and is therefore less useful in diagnosing early disease. Computed tomography scans are the most accurate type of scans but should only be used in the more severe interventions due to cost and radiation exposure.Keywords: CT scan, chest X-ray, ultrasound, pneumonia, critical care

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.