Combating Review Blackmail on E-Commerce Platforms

Recognizing the impact of online reviews on sellers’ earnings, consumers engage in “review blackmail” by posting negative reviews and demanding a ransom for their removal. We conduct a field study and a laboratory experiment to examine whether, how, and when sellers’ exposure of such blackmail in their responses affects consumer perceptions and behaviors on e-commerce platforms. We find that exposing blackmail enhances consumers’ support for removing such reviews and improves their attitudes toward sellers by reducing perceived seller responsibility and increasing perceived sympathy. However, these effects are context-dependent. The effects of blackmail exposure on consumer perceived seller responsibility and sympathy diminish when a third party, such as a logistics provider, is involved in the seller-reviewer dispute. Sellers including detailed explanations in their responses can further weaken the diminishing effects of third-party involvement. Our findings offer implications for sellers in managing consumer reviews and for platforms in developing dispute resolution mechanisms.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2024-12-15
Primary Topic
Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combating Review Blackmail on E-Commerce Platforms

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing
article

Combating Review Blackmail on E-Commerce Platforms

article en

Abstract

Recognizing the impact of online reviews on sellers’ earnings, consumers engage in “review blackmail” by posting negative reviews and demanding a ransom for their removal. We conduct a field study and a laboratory experiment to examine whether, how, and when sellers’ exposure of such blackmail in their responses affects consumer perceptions and behaviors on e-commerce platforms. We find that exposing blackmail enhances consumers’ support for removing such reviews and improves their attitudes toward sellers by reducing perceived seller responsibility and increasing perceived sympathy. However, these effects are context-dependent. The effects of blackmail exposure on consumer perceived seller responsibility and sympathy diminish when a third party, such as a logistics provider, is involved in the seller-reviewer dispute. Sellers including detailed explanations in their responses can further weaken the diminishing effects of third-party involvement. Our findings offer implications for sellers in managing consumer reviews and for platforms in developing dispute resolution mechanisms.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Combating Review Blackmail on E-Commerce Platforms · Journal of the Association for Information Systems (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS